Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
The decision said Liberty Ridge qualifies as a public accommodation because it regularly collects fees for space, facilities, services and meals, so it cannot be considered “distinctly private.”
So...I guess it'd be considered private if it didn't regularly collect fees for those aspects? I didn't say I personally agreed with the decision; I was just pointing out that since it's already been made, the logic that not allowing same-sex marriage ceremonies counts as discrimination is valid. If you want to argue against the court, you have to do so regarding their public-private decision, not the ruling of discrimination.
Comment