Originally posted by square_peg
View Post
But...that's what critics mean when they say the film whitewashed the reality of slavery.
I explained earlier in the thread that the false depiction was done for self-serving reasons to make the white slaveowners look good. The reality is that slaveowners sexually exploited female slaves, and to whitewash that reality, mammy characters in shows were desexualized and depicted as ugly and deeply loyal to the white families. There's a difference between that and simply having inaccurate depictions in movies like Braveheart.
I didn't say anything about evil intentions. I don't think Hanna and Barbera actively hated black people. But they did use a character that was ultimately derived from racist minstrel shows (by extension of Mammy from GWTW being based off the mammy archetype, and hence they used racist elements in Tom and Jerry. Having racist elements isn't the same thing as having evil racist intentions.
This is irrelevant, as I never made any comment on whether it was okay. Whether it is or isn't doesn't affect whether the depiction of black women in mammy archetypes is acceptable.
Perry has been accused of minstrelsy and playing into black stereotypes with the Madea character, most notably by fellow black director Spike Lee. Perry's argument with Lee dates back to a 2009 interview in which Lee referred to Perry's films as "coonery buffoonery".[24] Lee equated the Madea movies with the old-time minstrel shows which lampooned black people as dim-witted, lazy, buffoonish, superstitious and happy-go-lucky,[25][26] and further stated that if a white director made a movie depicting black people in such a manner he would be ostracized.[24]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madea#Criticism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madea#Criticism
Funny how those things are only wrong when a white person does it, but many black people will line up around the block to watch a black person do the same thing, eh? I love how a fellow black director noticed this too, but again... Tyler Perry gets a free pass because he is black and it therefore okay for him to lampoon black's with classic stereotypes, but if a white person did it. What would the attitude be? The hypocrisy of the entire, "Waaaa that's racism!" crowd is truly an amazing thing to watch. Don't you agree?
No, the argument is that she acts similarly to how a racist caricature acted, and hence it is a racist element.
I don't see how a different version made 60 years later is relevant to racial attitudes in the 1940s and 50s.
It seems logical rather than amazing that portraying a character in a manner that doesn't reflect racial stereotypes isn't considered racist. But oh well.
I wonder if you know how you seem to others, frequently saying "my point went woosh over your head" but rarely ever clarifying your point, and describing posts written in a calm tone as a foaming rant. Paprika evidently noticed that something was amiss with your characterizations.
Comment