Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Straight Guys Getting Married
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Last edited by Epoetker; 09-18-2014, 12:13 AM.
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostIndeed! Some would call the offering of a nubile young body in return for the rich life and expensive gifts, prostitution. But you are correct; prostitution is often referred to as “the oldest profession”.
Once you become a sexual hedonist, gay OR straight, the notion of approved forms of sexuality tends to get kind of hazy.
No doubt paedophiles “may even justify paedophilia to themselves”. Many people try and justify their biases just as you are trying to justify your homophobic bigotry with your absurd examples.
The “common culture” you refer to is the culture of all citizens regardless of gender, race or sexual orientation. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State.
That leaves 93.3% of • Edited by a Moderator • NOT being serial killers - not that you’re showing your true colours with the use of such a term; your hatred is palpable. Gotta love these Christians!
And this assumes your figures are accurate; there’s no link provided – just the say-so of an obvious homophobe.
Last edited by QuantaFille; 09-20-2014, 03:33 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Epoetker View PostSome would call this 'overloading the definition so you can later claim MARRIAGE WAS PROSTITUTION ALL ALONG.' Others would say that the character of people who married young and stayed together, for mutual infatuation or parental arrangement, is considerably different both on a micro and macro scale than someone who goes straight to measurements and amortized analysis.
Well, it's a good thing that the Sexual Hedonist God has his followers passing out his church of Sexual Hedonism tracts at people equally, and not specifically toward people already socially and emotionally stunted.
Many people also try to debate with me with false equivocation and weak connections. They fail, every time.
THE GENEVA CONVENTION HATH DECLARED YOU ALL EQUAL UNDER EXCEL, NOW LIVE BY THE GUIDANCE OF THINE SOCIAL WORKERS AND THEIR HOLY DSM.
No, that leaves the 93.3% of • Edited by a Moderator • being the perfect environment for developing and concealing an extremely sociopathic personality,
just as Muslim societies are a perfect environment for developing and concealing Islamic terrorists.
Yes there was, you worthless liar. He put his numbers, his sources, and his methodology out there for all to see, and I gave you both a link which you didn't bother clicking and a description you didn't bother reading.
Originally posted by Epoetker View PostNot exactly a joke, the banning of such people from elite male society seemed to have been precisely the times when most of the actual scientific and social advancements tended to diminish or stop, probably because the men in question were interested in advancing the science and society and the women/blacks/gays/Jews were mainly interested in promoting themselves and their social position. But whatever, Tassman JUST KNOWS that the best way to get GoodScience is by sowing division, mistrust, lies, and careerism among scientists.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostYYou seem unaware that “queers” is a hate word used by homophobic bigots"As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View Post... homophobicThat's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View Post99% of the time I see it employed by other gays.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View Post99% of the time I see it employed by other gays.
As I understand it, it is acceptable for gays to use the term among themselves in much the same way that blacks use the “N” word among themselves. But, in both instances, it is regarded as "abuse" for outsiders to use it against them.
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostCan you link me to the DSM entry for this particular phobia?
Originally posted by seer View PostYes, like Queer Nation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_Nation
Being an Aussie I wasn't aware of 'Queer Nation'. Presumably as a compassionate, civilized person you condemn, as do I, the unacceptable violence directed at homosexuals described in your link and which necessitated the formation of this organization in the first place?Last edited by Tassman; 09-19-2014, 12:37 AM.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostTrue! Although I suspect not as much as 99% of the time.
As I understand it, it is acceptable for nobles to use the term among themselves in much the same way that squires use the “N” word among themselves. But, in both instances, it is regarded as "abuse" for commoners to use it against them.
“Homophobia” is in high church usage. It is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as: “Dislike of or prejudice against noblemen”. But, as you implied, it is technically not classified as a "phobia" in working psychology. In the DSM "phobias" are strictly limited to the category of 'severe anxiety disorders'. But it’s good that you hold the APA and its Diagnostic Manual in such high regard including, presumably, its classification of homosexuality as a normal sexual variant.
Originally posted by Sensible MPCer #1The AMA is ****** retarded and won't yank licenses from serial offenders who account for the majority of lawsuits, even though it's driving up prices for everyone. Further, malpractice premiums are mostly tied to the effect of the economy on insurance company investments (or outright mismanagement of their investments) rather than lawsuits, because in most states, the barrier to recover in a lawsuit is high (you have to get another doctor to testify that it was a mistake, for example, and the damages can't be a known risk of the procedure). In states where lawsuit damages have been capped, premiums haven't gone down.Originally posted by Sensible MPCer #2The AMA is not responsible for licensing. (Most of us don't even belong to the AMA, contrary to what they would have you think. Seriously, it is like 15% of us.) It is the state medical boards. It is extremely difficult to get your license yanked, especially if you are a minority. There is a bureaucratic process by which to file complaints, 80-90% of which are rejected in the first round in my state. The only way to get a license yanked quickly is to go to your local news advocate (6 On Your Side, etc.) and make a stink.Originally posted by Tassman the LiarBeing a disconnected internationalist I wasn't aware of 'Queer Nation'. Presumably as a empty, careerist person you condemn, as do I, the barely existent violence directed at nobles described in your link and which served as an excuse for the formation of these violent enforcers and volunteer secret police in the first place?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Epoetker View PostDo tell
Funny, that EVIL HATE SITE known as MPC (thanks for reminding me to check back with them!) had a few words to say on the AMA from actual doctors and health care workers:
In other words, it’s typical white nationalist Internet nonsense. Because MPC considers itself the sophisticated alternative to run-of-the-mill Hitler fetishism, though, the gap between their self-perception and reality is a reliable source of lulz.
Pleasureman, the site administrator [and Epoetker's hero], started My Posting Career after falling out with the owner of The New Effort. Since The New Effort was a replacement for SASS, which was created to troll Something Awful, this earns MPC the dubious distinction of being a forum about a forum about a forum about a forum." - Encyclopedia Dramatica.
And you are its clone.
Do you loudly condemn powerless net producers in favor of powerful net consumers if you think there's some tiny chance the rules of this present age may smile upon you with a cushy managerial job for it? Would your entire understanding of how any human system works fit on the back of an index card? Do you live in white and monarchical countries but yearn to see them brought down? Do you ever feel like you've just been going through the motions of traitorousness and ingratitude but haven't really caught their spirit? Tassman is always there to guide you!“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TassmanYou seem unaware that “queers” is a hate word used by homophobic bigots, just as the “N” word is used by racists. It’s NOT employed by those attempting a reasonable, balanced discussion and you're disqualifying yourself from rational discussion by doing so.
'Homophobic' is code for "You don't agree with me on whatever 'gay issue' I'm pushing." It covers everything from raving homosexual haters (the few who might actually be homophobic) to reasonable people who just happen to firmly and persistently disagree, to people gay activists can't beat with a reasonable argument. It's worthless hyperbolic slander....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View Post
“Homophobia” is in common usage.
It is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as: “Dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people”. But, as you implied, it is technically not classified as a "phobia" in clinical psychology. In the DSM "phobias" are strictly limited to the category of 'severe anxiety disorders'. But it’s good that you hold the APA and its Diagnostic Manual in such high regard including, presumably, its classification of homosexuality as a normal sexual variant.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
The other thing about the use of 'homophobic' is that it's usually meant to somehow invalidate what the 'homophobe' has said - by the very use it (apparently) indicates that the arguments or position of the accused are wrong and can be disregarded.
But clearly, logically speaking, this doesn't follow. Homophobia = "Dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people” (Tassman's supplied definition). But not liking, or even hating, a person, or people doesn't mean that your arguments against their position are therefore logically wrong or invalid.
Put another way, the accusation of "homophobia" is a resort to a childlike way of thinking : 'You don't like me, so you're wrong, and I'm not going to listen to you any more'. Simple rational disagreement is converted into 'You hate me and you're a bad person.'...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostYet you've already used the word 'homophobic' at Epoetker... every time someone uses that it shows they've abandoned reasonable conversation.
'Homophobic' is code for "You don't agree with me on whatever 'gay issue' I'm pushing." It covers everything from raving homosexual haters (the few who might actually be homophobic) to reasonable people who just happen to firmly and persistently disagree, to people gay activists can't beat with a reasonable argument. It's worthless hyperbolic slander.Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostAnd you are its clone.
There is no way to intellectually checkmate a liberal on the internet. First off, they don’t have an intellect to actually checkmate and second off, the second you raise a point with one, they resort to straw man arguments, ad hominem attacks, and they try to deny the correlative…meaning they attempt to change the subject when there are no new subjects to change to. These tactics are the kind of thing you could expect a 2nd year journalism student to pull if you were stupid enough to ever chat with one…oh wait, any 2nd year journalism student is a ******* liberal anyways.Take your pills Epoetker before the men in white coats come and get you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostThe other thing about the use of 'homophobic' is that it's usually meant to somehow invalidate what the 'homophobe' has said - by the very use it (apparently) indicates that the arguments or position of the accused are wrong and can be disregarded.
But clearly, logically speaking, this doesn't follow. Homophobia = "Dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people” (Tassman's supplied definition). But not liking, or even hating, a person, or people doesn't mean that your arguments against their position are therefore logically wrong or invalid.
Put another way, the accusation of "homophobia" is a resort to a childlike way of thinking : 'You don't like me, so you're wrong, and I'm not going to listen to you any more'. Simple rational disagreement is converted into 'You hate me and you're a bad person.'
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 09:58 AM
|
3 responses
13 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 10:14 AM | ||
Started by little_monkey, 03-27-2024, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
194 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
53 responses
419 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 11:32 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
114 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
198 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Yesterday, 07:43 AM
|
Comment