Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

The Homosexual Double Standard, Ad-hoc, Cavalcade!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    An emoticon is all that's necessary.
    All that's ever necessary, in your case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    I approve of your decision to communicate in emoticons only, as that's all most of your responses amount to.
    An emoticon is all that's necessary.
    Last edited by Tassman; 09-28-2014, 05:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    I approve of your decision to communicate in emoticons only, as that's all most of your responses amount to.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    Pointing!



    Sputtering!



    Winning

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    Grandiose nonsense!
    Pointing!

    Projection!
    Sputtering!

    Of course he isn't...............?
    Winning

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    Not really. My edits are mainly to substitute your inaccurate and misleading words which mean nothing with words that reflect either your actual meaning or the reality of the situation.
    Grandiose nonsense!

    It's a good policy for dealing with compulsive liars.
    Projection!

    Originally posted by Kristian Joensen View Post
    Epoetker isn't deranged? :P
    Of course he isn't...............?
    Last edited by Tassman; 09-25-2014, 04:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    Of course you agree, given that you're responding to your own clarifying of my text; not to agree with yourself would be deranged behaviour.
    Not really. My edits are mainly to substitute your inaccurate and misleading words which mean nothing with words that reflect either your actual meaning or the reality of the situation. It's a good policy for dealing with compulsive liars.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jedidiah
    replied
    He ain't alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kristian Joensen
    replied
    Epoetker isn't deranged? :P

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    Yes, yes indeed.
    Of course you agree, given that you're responding to your own rewording of my text; not to agree with yourself would be deranged behaviour.

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    I think you persistently clarify my texts and respond to your own artfully edited version of them, because you long ago won the debate and have no other need other than highlighting the fact that I insist on posting halfhearted responses to every reply no matter whether or not I actually have anything to add.
    Yes, yes indeed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    Now, now, Tassman, do you think I'm doing this for your benefit?
    I think you persistently rewrite my texts and respond to your own mangled version of them, because you long ago lost the debate and have no other recourse other than school-yard taunting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Edited by a Moderator

    Moderated By: QuantaFille

    Post removed.

    ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
    Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Padded Room unless told otherwise.

    Last edited by QuantaFille; 10-07-2014, 02:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tassman
    replied
    Originally posted by Epoetker View Post
    Here's a gigantic hint, Tassy-if you had anything useful to say, it wouldn't be so easy to crush, dismiss, and reverse it with a few word substitutions. Rhetoric always rhymes, facts can't be so easily shoehorned into a soundbite.
    What I said was that my “ideology” can and does stand on its own merits. It does not require a loser's tricks, such as altering opponent's texts, shouting via large fonts, or “power plays” - as you grandiosely describe your inability to respond to the actual facts of the discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Epoetker
    replied
    Originally posted by Tassman View Post
    My “ideology” cannot stand on its own merits without the necessity to resort to unethical games or “power plays” - if that’s what you want to call the clarifying of my text as per this post plus many previous ones.
    Here's a gigantic hint, Tassy-if you had anything useful to say, it wouldn't be so easy to crush, dismiss, and reverse it with a few word substitutions. Rhetoric always rhymes, facts can't be so easily shoehorned into a soundbite.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by tabibito, Yesterday, 04:28 PM
3 responses
65 views
0 likes
Last Post tabibito  
Started by Sparko, Yesterday, 08:10 AM
2 responses
46 views
0 likes
Last Post Gondwanaland  
Started by CivilDiscourse, 09-19-2021, 07:03 PM
5 responses
56 views
0 likes
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
 
Started by Gondwanaland, 09-19-2021, 12:34 PM
19 responses
157 views
2 likes
Last Post Mountain Man  
Started by Gondwanaland, 09-19-2021, 10:21 AM
6 responses
99 views
1 like
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
 
Working...
X