Apparently certain people here have been wondering why they can't find DIRECT EVIDENCE OF POLICE NOT POLICING in the Ferguson case. Nicholas Stix has a good overview on why:
This is done mainly by language control, which routinely violates AP style guides, but no one gets punished for.
Stix, uncharacteristically, leaves out Mike Brown's affiliation with the Bloods, and Trayvon Martin's affiliation with the Crips, but apparently asking about these things is just completely out of the question for national media. The last paragraph, though, is gold:
Click the original Vdare link at the top to get a version with all the links to the original stories. It is, of course, more well-sourced than anything Jesse the Racist or square_peg or myth bother to come up with in their daily media perusals, and it's well worth your time to donate to them just to encourage actual journalism rather than careerist propaganda disguised as reporting.
If the MSM did have any honesty, they would have asked questions along the following lines:
-What injuries did Mike Brown inflict on Officer Wilson?
-Why did Brown’s mother, Lesley McSpadden, not apologize to the South Asian convenience store manager whom her son had robbed, assaulted and battered, or to the white policeman, whom her son had attacked and had probably sought to murder?
-Why would a mother who was supposedly racked with grief immediately run out and engage the nation’s most racist, unethical lawyer, Benjamin Crump, whose specialty is race hoaxes and shaking down white taxpayers?
-Does Lesley McSpadden intend to share any of her misbegotten windfall with the store owners whose lives her son and his supporters have destroyed?
-What sort of people respond to their friend robbing a store by looting and burning down a store—and then, a few days later, realizing that they’d hit the wrong store, looting and burning down a second store?
-What kind of people burn down their own town?
-Why are “respectable” blacks supporting the rioters and looters?
-Why do the “eyewitness” stories contradict each other so, and why are they so lacking in credibility?
-“Why didn’t they shoot those looters?”—in the words of a black Ferguson resident. (In fact, police-inflicted injuries seem vanishingly rare).
-Why are President Obama and the highest lawman in the land, Attorney General Eric Holder, conspiring to obstruct justice, and violate the civil rights of white Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson?
The MSM have followed the same script they followed in promoting the Trayvon Martin Hoax. They are trying to score millions for the family of the “victim” (and his lawyers); diminish, excuse, and glorify black felons; handcuff and demonize white policemen; and get the man who killed their darling murdered.
-What injuries did Mike Brown inflict on Officer Wilson?
-Why did Brown’s mother, Lesley McSpadden, not apologize to the South Asian convenience store manager whom her son had robbed, assaulted and battered, or to the white policeman, whom her son had attacked and had probably sought to murder?
-Why would a mother who was supposedly racked with grief immediately run out and engage the nation’s most racist, unethical lawyer, Benjamin Crump, whose specialty is race hoaxes and shaking down white taxpayers?
-Does Lesley McSpadden intend to share any of her misbegotten windfall with the store owners whose lives her son and his supporters have destroyed?
-What sort of people respond to their friend robbing a store by looting and burning down a store—and then, a few days later, realizing that they’d hit the wrong store, looting and burning down a second store?
-What kind of people burn down their own town?
-Why are “respectable” blacks supporting the rioters and looters?
-Why do the “eyewitness” stories contradict each other so, and why are they so lacking in credibility?
-“Why didn’t they shoot those looters?”—in the words of a black Ferguson resident. (In fact, police-inflicted injuries seem vanishingly rare).
-Why are President Obama and the highest lawman in the land, Attorney General Eric Holder, conspiring to obstruct justice, and violate the civil rights of white Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson?
The MSM have followed the same script they followed in promoting the Trayvon Martin Hoax. They are trying to score millions for the family of the “victim” (and his lawyers); diminish, excuse, and glorify black felons; handcuff and demonize white policemen; and get the man who killed their darling murdered.
St. Louis Riverfront Times reporter Jessica Lussenhop published the Trayvon-style picture of a much younger, smaller, and cuter Mike Brown (allegedly 16, but looking more like 12), and quoted family members on his hopes of becoming a rapper. [Family of Michael Brown, Teenager Shot to Death By Ferguson Police, Talks About His Life, August 10, 2014]
Apparently, he already was an accomplished racist, gutter-mouth rapper (warning: listening to this may be physically painful), who bragged of sex and killing, but the family didn’t want the public hearing his “art.” [Listen to Mike Brown’s VERY Explicit Rap Songs Featuring Drugs, Drinking and Murder, SooperMexican.com, August 15, 2014]The MSM deal in the Politically Correct euphemisms.
As still with Trayvon Martin two-and-a-half years after his death, there is clearly a newsroom rule whereby a black thug who died violently following his own violent act must be described as “unarmed:” “Unarmed black teenager” (7,180,000 hits at Google). “Unarmed black” + “Sean Bell” (13,100, but that’s because the case is almost eight years old). “Unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin” (92,800). “Unarmed black teen Michael Brown” gets 830,000 hits.
But all were armed with deadly weapons—Bell with the car he was driving, bumping an undercover cop; Martin with the ground, into which he was smashing George Zimmerman’s head; Brown, aside from his attempt at murdering Officer Wilson with the latter’s service weapon, with a 6’4,” 292 lbs., body.
Apparently, he already was an accomplished racist, gutter-mouth rapper (warning: listening to this may be physically painful), who bragged of sex and killing, but the family didn’t want the public hearing his “art.” [Listen to Mike Brown’s VERY Explicit Rap Songs Featuring Drugs, Drinking and Murder, SooperMexican.com, August 15, 2014]The MSM deal in the Politically Correct euphemisms.
As still with Trayvon Martin two-and-a-half years after his death, there is clearly a newsroom rule whereby a black thug who died violently following his own violent act must be described as “unarmed:” “Unarmed black teenager” (7,180,000 hits at Google). “Unarmed black” + “Sean Bell” (13,100, but that’s because the case is almost eight years old). “Unarmed black teen Trayvon Martin” (92,800). “Unarmed black teen Michael Brown” gets 830,000 hits.
But all were armed with deadly weapons—Bell with the car he was driving, bumping an undercover cop; Martin with the ground, into which he was smashing George Zimmerman’s head; Brown, aside from his attempt at murdering Officer Wilson with the latter’s service weapon, with a 6’4,” 292 lbs., body.
Like Brown’s family, the MSM have been trying to get Officer Wilson murdered. On Friday, CNN showed his house and street number, and named the street. The Daily Mail then repeated the offense. And on Saturday, Yahoo News reportorialist Jason Sickles published Wilson’s photograph.[DEATH WISH? Media Draws Map to Home of Ferguson Police Officer Who Shot Mike Brown, by Jim Hoft, Gateway Pundit, August 16, 2014,]
Wilson will not only have to move, but change his and family’s names, and possibly flee the country. There’s a special circle in hell for Sickles and his ilk.
Many observers think the MSM get “duped” or “fall for” these race hoaxes. But I have been studying race hoaxes since Tawana Brawley in 1988, and by the Duke Rape Hoax I concluded that the MSM are never fooled. They are always active collaborators—and in some cases, e.g., the AP’s Tom Hays, spin hoaxes out of whole cloth on their own.
The primary legal and moral blame for the riots and looting must go to the black rioters and looters themselves. Next comes what passes for their families and “the community.”
But the reason they felt so empowered was police passivity.
In Los Angeles in 1992; Seattle and Cincinnati in 2001; Baghdad in 2003; Ferguson, in 2014, and countless other incidents, looters ran wild—because they saw policemen or Marines ordered by their commanding officers to passively stand down.
Thousands of years ago, men had learned that the only effective way to deal with anarchy and looting is by what VDARE.com editor Peter Brimelow has called “ruthless coercion.”
Why then, were the men whose job it was to coerce looters standing by and watching?
Because American policemen realize that the Main Stream Media are undeclared combatants in a race war. They focus on whites shooting non-whites, so they can demonize the good guys.
We need to stop talking about “media bias”—and start talking about media evil.
Wilson will not only have to move, but change his and family’s names, and possibly flee the country. There’s a special circle in hell for Sickles and his ilk.
Many observers think the MSM get “duped” or “fall for” these race hoaxes. But I have been studying race hoaxes since Tawana Brawley in 1988, and by the Duke Rape Hoax I concluded that the MSM are never fooled. They are always active collaborators—and in some cases, e.g., the AP’s Tom Hays, spin hoaxes out of whole cloth on their own.
The primary legal and moral blame for the riots and looting must go to the black rioters and looters themselves. Next comes what passes for their families and “the community.”
But the reason they felt so empowered was police passivity.
In Los Angeles in 1992; Seattle and Cincinnati in 2001; Baghdad in 2003; Ferguson, in 2014, and countless other incidents, looters ran wild—because they saw policemen or Marines ordered by their commanding officers to passively stand down.
Thousands of years ago, men had learned that the only effective way to deal with anarchy and looting is by what VDARE.com editor Peter Brimelow has called “ruthless coercion.”
Why then, were the men whose job it was to coerce looters standing by and watching?
Because American policemen realize that the Main Stream Media are undeclared combatants in a race war. They focus on whites shooting non-whites, so they can demonize the good guys.
We need to stop talking about “media bias”—and start talking about media evil.
Comment