From Roy Spencer, Ph.D.
ETA: I posted a comment ― somewhere in a post in a thread among too many threads to locate now ― contrary to Spencer's last comment at the end of his article linked above.
I stand corrected.
Lest there be any confusion about that to which I am referring (given the fact that Spencer's article does not stand alone but is on a page containing serial posts/articles), here it is:
Climate Polling Results Lead to Weird Press Coverage
August 13th, 2014 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
A recent polling of Americans on their attitudes about how much scientists know (or claim to know) about global warming, as well as what should be done about it, has led to very different treatments in the press, specifically in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, which commissioned the poll.
August 13th, 2014 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
A recent polling of Americans on their attitudes about how much scientists know (or claim to know) about global warming, as well as what should be done about it, has led to very different treatments in the press, specifically in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, which commissioned the poll.
ETA: I posted a comment ― somewhere in a post in a thread among too many threads to locate now ― contrary to Spencer's last comment at the end of his article linked above.
I stand corrected.
Lest there be any confusion about that to which I am referring (given the fact that Spencer's article does not stand alone but is on a page containing serial posts/articles), here it is:
When climate models can’t even hindcast global temperature changes in the last 30-40 years — where the answer is already known — how can we rely on them for forecasts?
It isn’t rocket science…it’s actually much more difficult than that.
It isn’t rocket science…it’s actually much more difficult than that.
Comment