Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

The Climate Enforcers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Just Some Dude
    replied
    To be fair, the geocentrists of Galileo's day were more scientific than those who force global warming down everyone's throat.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jedidiah
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    Apparently science is not about testing or facts. It is about "consensus" now. It's a popularity contest.

    With that attitude we would still believe in Geocentrism.
    Didn't you know science is settled in the courtroom now days?

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    Apparently science is not about testing or facts. It is about "consensus" now. It's a popularity contest.

    With that attitude we would still believe in Geocentrism.
    Didn't anyone tell Galileo that it was settled science?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by seer View Post
    Amazing:

    From Andrew Dessler's article:



    And they rejected his paper, why?



    He is quoting Dr. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, who is no slouch.

    http://curry.eas.gatech.edu/
    Apparently science is not about testing or facts. It is about "consensus" now. It's a popularity contest.

    With that attitude we would still believe in Geocentrism.

    Leave a comment:


  • seer
    replied
    Originally posted by John Reece View Post

    Amazing:

    From Andrew Dessler's article:

    Curry argued that in her view “both the climate change problem and its solution have been vastly oversimplified”, and reviewed global temperature, climate sensitivity and sea-level data from the IPCC AR5. She finds that the case for human factors dominating temperature change of the past 130 years is weaker than it was 10 years ago, and evidence for the importance of natural variability on climate changes, is growing.
    And they rejected his paper, why?

    After thoughtful and lengthy consultation with colleagues and AGU staff, I have decided to reject the submission based on the significant scientific consensus regarding the question of human-induced climate change. While discussion of this topic continues, it is no longer a topic of scientific controversy.
    He is quoting Dr. Judith Curry of Georgia Tech, who is no slouch.

    http://curry.eas.gatech.edu/

    Leave a comment:


  • John Reece
    started a topic The Climate Enforcers

    The Climate Enforcers

    LATEST OUTRAGE FROM THE CLIMATE ENFORCERS

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 06:16 AM
8 responses
41 views
0 likes
Last Post Ronson
by Ronson
 
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Today, 05:12 AM
37 responses
134 views
0 likes
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
 
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 07:39 PM
19 responses
105 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by Cow Poke, 01-17-2022, 10:22 PM
40 responses
247 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by Gondwanaland, 01-17-2022, 09:48 PM
14 responses
95 views
0 likes
Last Post Sparko
by Sparko
 
Working...
X