Originally posted by Darth Executor
View Post
Though in a pinch you can call them "gnostics" if you're looking to be historically correct in drawing the line of succession. But this post requires an elaboration of what's currently linked in my signature:
Originally posted by The Anti-Gnostic
NGOs rarely, if ever, deserve the "N" in their name, and "stakeholders" and "foundations" could as easily be replaced with "investors" and "corporations" if you wanted to slyly push some liberal hot-buttons. I very much doubt you can out-popular them (they control the press, dude!) out-legislate them (their primary skillset) or even, assuming that you did defeat them in court, count on that victory against this form of land-grab to be final, as people like these tend to be professional shapeshifters.
So, either kill them, legally or extralegally, or wait for the inevitable collapse of their tenuous arrangements to kill them for you. (In San Francisco, especially, favor may go to the second option.) When the sword is in your hand there is no need for maintaining legions of Pharisees to oppress the people, eat out their substance, etc. with thousands of made-up rules. And as Pakistan shows, NGOs fold fairly quickly against those willing to keep up the pressure. Hopefully you'll be civilized enough to know when to put down the sword.
Leave a comment: