Originally posted by oxmixmudd
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
WHISLEBLOWER: Trump manipulating intelligance
Collapse
X
-
"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostAnd Al Capone was found guilty for the crimes for which there was actual evidence. In the case of Donald Trump, the Democrats took their best shot with the impeachment circus, and Trump was found to be not guilty."It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostHere is a question, had the Senate been Democrat led, do you think Trump would have been found not guilty?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostProbably not, which, all other things being equal, would have been an obvious miscarriage of justice when the prosecution in its opening argument openly admitted that they didn't actually have sufficient evidence to prove the charges.Last edited by JimL; 09-12-2020, 09:21 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostWhat the democrats didn't have was enough evidence...
I think at one point during the circus, Shifty Schiff even said something like, "I would love to show you the evidence to prove this, but we don't have it, so I can't."Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYes, that's what I said: the prosecution in its opening argument openly admitted that they didn't actually have sufficient evidence to prove the charges.
I think at one point during the circus, Shifty Schiff even said something like, "I would love to show you the evidence to prove this, but we don't have it, so I can't."
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostOh, they had enough alright, they just didn't have enough to force the republicans hand. And the reason for that was the Presidents obstruction and the republicans complicity in that and in their refusal to admit the subpoena of witnesses in the Senate trial. You Trumpsters aren't concerned about the truth or the facts, you were more concerned about the truth and the facts getting out. A sad bunch you are.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post...they just didn't have enough to force the republicans hand.
Perhaps a more intellectually honest position for you to take would be to say that while you still believe the President is guilty of crimes sufficient to remove him from office, the Democrats royally screwed up their attempts to prove it.Last edited by Mountain Man; 09-14-2020, 09:55 AM.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostThe moron Dumbocrats drummed up charges that had ZERO backing and that's it. And you know it's true.Last edited by Electric Skeptic; 09-14-2020, 10:17 AM.America - too good to let the conservatives drag it back to 1950.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Electric Skeptic View PostIn fact that's not remotely true.
If the Republicans had suddenly grown a pair, they'd have voted to impeach as well.
But we all know that Trump could murder someone on national TV and Republicans would give him a pass.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostIn fact it's completely true. Nothing the leftist hacks accused him of even remotely rose to a level of "high crimes and misdemeanors". It was a 3 year witch hunt. They threw every piece of poop against the wall in hopes that something would stick. When it was clear they had nothing, they invented charges.
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostA pair of lying faces like 2 faced Pelosi and Shifty Schiff would be the only thing they would have to grow in order to ride that farce.
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostAbsolutely false. Murder is a high crime.America - too good to let the conservatives drag it back to 1950.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYou're just repeating what I already said: The prosecution in its opening argument openly admitted that they didn't actually have sufficient evidence to prove the charges. If the supposed "smoking gun" witnesses were so critical to the Democrats' case that they couldn't present a compelling argument without them, then why didn't they secure that evidence before attempting to bring the case to trial?
Perhaps a more intellectually honest position for you to take would be to say that while you still believe the President is guilty of crimes sufficient to remove him from office, the Democrats royally screwed up their attempts to prove it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Electric Skeptic View PostComplete nonsense.
Nope. A desire to serve the country would have done it. So would a pair.
Republicans would still find a way to give him a pass. If Obama had done half of what Trump has, Republicans would have crucified him.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostFacts don't care about your feelings. The charges were prime grade bologna. Oscar Mayer is still trying to recreate THAT recipe...
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostVoting to not remove him IS serving their country. It put a temporary halt to an EXTREMELY dangerous precedent - to impeach any President you disagree politically with.
There was no such precedent or attempt at it. Trump was impeached for his actions, not is opinions.
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostTrumpOCD on full displayAmerica - too good to let the conservatives drag it back to 1950.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
78 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 10:23 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
52 responses
270 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 09:58 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
109 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
195 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Today, 07:43 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
83 responses
352 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 10:19 AM
|
Comment