Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Actual news

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Actual news

    There is the impeachment circus, but real government goes on.

    How Congress and the Federal Reserve Stole Christmas
    Written by Ron Paul
    Monday December 23, 2019

    The bickering over impeachment did not stop the president and Congress from coming together last week to avert a government shutdown by passing a 1.4 trillion dollar spending package.

    The bipartisan agreement has something for everyone — a 22 billion dollars increase to bring total spending on militarism to 738 billion dollars, and a 27 billion dollars increase to bring total spending on domestic programs to 632 billion dollars. It also imposes a national ban on selling tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to anyone under 21.

    The agreement was split into two bills. Both bills were unveiled last Monday afternoon. The bills passed the House on Tuesday, so only the House leadership and the members of the Appropriations Committee (and their staffs) who helped write the over 2,000-page deal had any idea what was in the bills. But most members voted for the spending bills because they were fearful of backlash over another Christmastime government shutdown. House leadership simply “waived” the rule requiring that all legislation be available at least three days before being voted upon.

    The modern practice of funding the government via gigantic omnibus bills that are rushed into law puts the growth of government on autopilot. This practice also gives the president more influence over the budget, violating the spirit, if not the letter, of the Constitution’s grant of authority to Congress to appropriate funds, which was intended as a check on executive power.

    Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve continues pumping billions into the repurchasing market. When the Fed began injecting money into the market in September, it said intervention was a temporary measure to address a short-term liquidity shortage. Three months later, the Fed is not only continuing to bail out the repurchasing market, it is preparing for other bailouts. This is further evidence that we are on the verge of another Fed-created economic crisis.
    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...ole-christmas/
    Did you not hear about this? Who cares, Merry Christmas, and enjoy the meaningless circus.
    Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

  • #2
    Isn't it amazing that the two sides seem like their in a political civil war, but when it comes to spending and debt, they're both in perfect synchronized lock-step? I'm actually not as surprised by this because the RINOs in the house have long forgotten what fiscal conservative was. What surprised me most of all is the fact they passed Trump's NDAA and FISA bills with absolutely no push-back from the Dems whatsoever. Not even a whimper. So, a president who's supposed to be a fascist, a nazi, a traitor, a dictator, corrupt, a Putin puppet according to the Dems, they grant him the biggest military budget on recent record and allow him to continue the power of warrant-less wiretapping when we haven't been attacked by any terrorists in almost two decades. Yup, it's one big sham.

    Comment


    • #3
      What both 'sides' want can be easily accommodated because spending is not zero sum, just borrow or print more money.

      What both 'sides' oppose is mostly an act, because they don't actually care about causes or ideology.
      Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

      Comment


      • #4
        What both "sides" want is....

        A) Whatever keeps them individually in office, getting richer and richer
        2) Whatever keeps their party in power, getting stronger and stronger
        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
          What both "sides" want is....

          A) Whatever keeps them individually in office, getting richer and richer
          2) Whatever keeps their party in power, getting stronger and stronger
          A frank look at politics immediately disproves the Schoolhouse Rock illusions, showing that the wisest thing is to not vote. But baby steps.

          Conservatives used to look for a snow-white unicorn with wings, a paragon of virtue that would stride into DC and make real change. Well, they've matured a little. They saw that the Tea Party and 'religious right' politicians are largely ineffective on the national level, gave up on childhood idealism, and supported Trump. Then they saw how deceptive the mass media is, how entrenched the Establishment Swamp, and they mature a little more. Baby steps.
          Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
            What both "sides" want is....

            A) Whatever keeps them individually in office, getting richer and richer
            2) Whatever keeps their party in power, getting stronger and stronger
            No, that's all your side wants, CP. The dems are fulfilling their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic, something that republicans like yourself feign to care about, but make obvious that you don't. Whatever keeps your side in power, perhaps making you richer, is what ya'll really care about, not the corruption, not the Constitution, not democracy and not your country. You all want a sham trial, and you've all admitted as much.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by demi-conservative View Post
              A frank look at politics immediately disproves the Schoolhouse Rock illusions, showing that the wisest thing is to not vote. But baby steps.

              Conservatives used to look for a snow-white unicorn with wings, a paragon of virtue that would stride into DC and make real change. Well, they've matured a little. They saw that the Tea Party and 'religious right' politicians are largely ineffective on the national level, gave up on childhood idealism, and supported Trump. Then they saw how deceptive the mass media is, how entrenched the Establishment Swamp, and they mature a little more. Baby steps.
              I think the real wake up call for conservatives was Mitt Romney who was sold to us by liberals as an "acceptable" candidate with an unassailable reputation, and boy oh boy, Obama is really going to be in trouble if this guy runs, because there's not a speck of dirt on him! Of course that didn't stop the Democrats and their media allies from destroying his reputation anyway, and when the going got tough, Romney rolled over and all but conceded the election to Obama. Trump, in many respects, is the anti-Romney.
              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
              Than a fool in the eyes of God


              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                I think the real wake up call for conservatives was Mitt Romney who was sold to us by liberals as an "acceptable" candidate with an unassailable reputation, and boy oh boy, Obama is really going to be in trouble if this guy runs, because there's not a speck of dirt on him! Of course that didn't stop the Democrats and their media allies from destroying his reputation anyway, and when the going got tough, Romney rolled over and all but conceded the election to Obama. Trump, in many respects, is the anti-Romney.
                Meanwhile, the looniest of the left are suckered into thinking the Democrats are "fulfilling their oath", when the entire process has been hyper-partisan.
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                  Meanwhile, the looniest of the left are suckered into thinking the Democrats are "fulfilling their oath", when the entire process has been hyper-partisan.
                  When one side fulfills their oath, and the other side betrays theirs, then it's partisan, but that it is partisan doesn't mean that there is no right or wrong, or that its all political. You're not looney, you're just complicit in the republicans betrayal.
                  Last edited by JimL; 12-28-2019, 06:13 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                    I think the real wake up call for conservatives was Mitt Romney who was sold to us by liberals as an "acceptable" candidate with an unassailable reputation, and boy oh boy, Obama is really going to be in trouble if this guy runs, because there's not a speck of dirt on him! Of course that didn't stop the Democrats and their media allies from destroying his reputation anyway, and when the going got tough, Romney rolled over and all but conceded the election to Obama. Trump, in many respects, is the anti-Romney.
                    So it was us liberals who sold you on Romney, eh MM? You guys are a laugh a minute.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
                      So it was us liberals who sold you on Romney, eh MM? You guys are a laugh a minute.
                      If you don't think the media can influence who wins the nomination then ask yourself how Trump with zero political experience suddenly became the front-runner of a crowded Republican field. It's because the Democrats thought he would be the easiest candidate for Hillary to beat, so the media started focusing its coverage on Trump, elevating him to front-runner status almost overnight. Only the plan backfired because Trump wasn't the joke candidate people made him out to be early on, and he ran a serious and focused campaign with an intent to win.
                      Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                      But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                      Than a fool in the eyes of God


                      From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                        If you don't think the media can influence who wins the nomination then ask yourself how Trump with zero political experience suddenly became the front-runner of a crowded Republican field. It's because the Democrats thought he would be the easiest candidate for Hillary to beat, so the media started focusing its coverage on Trump, elevating him to front-runner status almost overnight. Only the plan backfired because Trump wasn't the joke candidate people made him out to be early on, and he ran a serious and focused campaign with an intent to win.
                        Wow ...
                        My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1

                        If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not  bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26

                        This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
                          Wow ...
                          That Clinton originally wanted Trump to win the GOP contest is established fact.

                          So to take Bush down, Clinton’s team drew up a plan to pump Trump up. Shortly after her kickoff, top aides organized a strategy call, whose agenda included a memo to the Democratic National Committee: “This memo is intended to outline the strategy and goals a potential Hillary Clinton presidential campaign would have regarding the 2016 Republican presidential field,” it read.

                          “The variety of candidates is a positive here, and many of the lesser known can serve as a cudgel to move the more established candidates further to the right. In this scenario, we don’t want to marginalize the more extreme candidates, but make them more ‘Pied Piper’ candidates who actually represent the mainstream of the Republican Party,” read the memo.

                          “Pied Piper candidates include, but aren’t limited to:
                          • Ted Cruz
                          • Donald Trump
                          • Ben Carson
                          We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to [take] them seriously."

                          While the campaign also kept a close eye on Rubio, monitoring his announcement speech and tightly designing the tweeted responses to his moves, Clinton’s team in Brooklyn was delightedly puzzled by Trump’s shift into the pole position that July after attacking John McCain by declaring, “I like people who weren’t captured.”

                          Eleven days after those comments about McCain, Clinton aides sought to push the plan even further: An agenda item for top aides’ message planning meeting read, “How do we prevent Bush from bettering himself/how do we maximize Trump and others?"

                          They wouldn’t have to work very hard at it though; the debates were the beginning of the end for the candidate Clinton’s team always thought she would face on Election Day. The day after the first debate in August, Clinton confidante Neera Tanden emailed Podesta her analysis: “Bush sucked. I’m glad Hillary is obsessed with the one candidate who would be easiest to beat :) Besides Trump, of course.”

                          “Just like everybody, I thought this was a Bush against a Clinton, that’s all it was going to be,” said former Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle. “When I saw the first set of debates, I would turn them on in an entertainment mode to see what Donald’s going to say today. It was funny."

                          Bush sucked. I’m glad Hillary is obsessed with the one candidate who would be easiest to beat :) Besides Trump, of course.”
                          Clinton aides finally started to see Trump as more than a tool to destroy Bush. In fact, Mook took him so seriously that his team’s internal, if informal, guidance was to hold fire on Trump during the primary and resist the urge to distribute any of the opposition research the Democrats were scrambling to amass against him. That hoarding plan remained in place deep into 2016 as some senior aides stayed convinced that a race against Trump would be a dream for Clinton

                          Clinton strategists' initial reaction to Trump’s blaze through the primaries at the time was giddy disbelief

                          https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...d-trump-214428
                          The only thing to say 'wow' about is your ignorance of this fact.
                          Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                            What both "sides" want is....

                            A) Whatever keeps them individually in office, getting richer and richer
                            2) Whatever keeps their party in power, getting stronger and stronger
                            Should Tweb be actively promoting Bernie Sanders? He would be very different and a signal to the rest of the world that the US is ready to show world leadership once more; towards more ethical government.
                            “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
                            “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
                            “not all there” - you know who you are

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by dirtfloor View Post
                              Should Tweb be actively promoting Bernie Sanders? He would be very different and a signal to the rest of the world that the US is ready to show world leadership once more; towards more ethical government.
                              Bernie would be a dream candidate for the rest of world because other countries only love the US when we're militarily deficient and "sharing" our wealth through lopsided trade agreements.
                              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                              Than a fool in the eyes of God


                              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by seer, Today, 01:12 PM
                              4 responses
                              42 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Sparko
                              by Sparko
                               
                              Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
                              42 responses
                              270 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post oxmixmudd  
                              Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
                              60 responses
                              380 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seanD
                              by seanD
                               
                              Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
                              0 responses
                              27 views
                              1 like
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-16-2024, 06:47 AM
                              100 responses
                              436 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                              Working...
                              X