List of Trump's crimes?

[One Bad Pig]

As I said to Sparko - that resolves to censure. There is something very unbalanced here - as I said, the same sorts of disagreements occur between you and Charles, JimL and others. Yet you do not 'regret' your conversations with them. And there have been other personalities on this site that a far more aggressive than I have ever been, and they were never censured in this manner either. You need to ask yourself why you can tolerate such feedback from others and not from this person.

So, you won't respect that. Duly noted.

[Cow Poke]

Refusing to have discussions with a person is censure.

I'm talking to you now, Jim, so it's obviously not censure.

You may as well just all put me on ignore.

I specified "political arguments", Jim.

[Charles]

Refusing to have discussions with a person is censure. You may as well just all put me on ignore.

Just continue to share your good points. If they are left unanswered, the will still be read and appreciated, your line of reasoning will still be followed. And if good reasons and good arguments are left unanswered I guess there could be more than one explanation...

[Cow Poke]

Just continue to share your good points. If they are left unanswered, the will still be read and appreciated, your line of reasoning will still be followed. And if good reasons and good arguments are left unanswered I guess there could be more than one explanation...

There certainly could be more than one explanation.

[Watermelon]

Did you not read the article?

Did you read it? It doesn’t say Hunter requested anything like you claimed. There’s nothing directly related to Joes motivation either.

It’s pure speculation which is why no one takes it seriously.

[oxmixmudd]

No, Jim, your exact words were...



I did, indeed, answer, but maybe I'm "no-one".

I was referring to the thread where I had tried to start a conversation on the issue with a hope to getting to why we (OBP and I) see things so differently. With the assumption being anyone is free to offer their answer, but no one did. It was not a reference to if you (or anyone) had ever discussed the issue in one form or another.

And to date, no one has answered those questions or engaged that line of thought, which is simply the fact, not a discussion of why that is the case.

[oxmixmudd]

Nobody is censuring you, Jim - you are free to post as much as you want on any topic you wish, subject to the rules of the forum. Similarly, I'm free not to engage in political arguments with you.

It is impossible to engage in a discussion when the other party will not do it. It makes it impossible for there to be dialogue. If I wanted a monologue, I could start a blog.

[rogue06]

It is impossible to engage in a discussion when the other party will not do it. It makes it impossible for there to be dialogue. If I wanted a monologue, I could start a blog.

You get mad when someone engages with you, calling it an "attack."

You get mad when they stop engaging with you, calling it "censuring."

[oxmixmudd]

So, you won't respect that. Duly noted.

The very fact you have engaged this course of action is itself massively disrespectful. And my replies to you at this point have nothing to do with Trump but rather trying to get you to reconsider that same disrespectful decision.

[One Bad Pig]

The very fact you have engaged this course of action is itself massively disrespectful. And my replies to you at this point have nothing to do with Trump but rather trying to get you to reconsider that same disrespectful decision.

Noted.

[oxmixmudd]

You get mad when someone engages with you, calling it an "attack."

You get mad when they stop engaging with you, calling it "censuring."

May God forgive you for you know not what you are doing.

[rogue06]

May God forgive you for you know not what you are doing.

I most certainly need God's forgiveness for a whole slew of things but this is not among them.

[Charles]

You get mad when someone engages with you, calling it an "attack."

You get mad when they stop engaging with you, calling it "censuring."

Since there has been many attacks on his person and since refusing to discuss with him is a rather strange way of behaving, I wonder if you are shaking your head at the right person.

The option of respectfully disagreeing is the one to go for.

I have disagreed with Ox and it never got personal.

[rogue06]

Since there has been many attacks on his person and since refusing to discuss with him is a rather strange way of behaving, I wonder if you are shaking your head at the right person.

The option of respectfully disagreeing is the one to go for.

I have disagreed with Ox and it never got personal.

As usual you haven't a clue.

[oxmixmudd]

I most certainly need God's forgiveness for a whole slew of things but this is not among them.

Actually, it is. But like I said, you dont know that.