Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
The obvious has been officially confirmed ...
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostDo you think he would have pleaded guilty if he knew the evidence against him had been falsified, and that there was other evidence proving his innocence?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostThen tell Barr that, because he doesn't seem to understand that. Doing the corrupt thing, (lying to the American people concerning the Mueller report, ignoring, and trying to cover up the whistleblower alert concerning Ukraine, involving himsself in a plot to extort a foriegn government)
because you want him to, is not the same thing as doing the right thing.
PS - I just got a new iPhone, and lost some of my contacts, so Barr is no longer on my speed-dial.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThere's a WHOLE LOT of assumin' goin' on there, ff.
Barr needs to do what's right, whether it benefits Putin or not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostYou know what you do when your threatened, you cooperate, you don't plead guilty if you're innocent. Flynn pleaded guilty because he knew the Feds had the goods on him, not because he was framed. You've got to be a real tin foil hat rube to believe that the entire U.S. Intel conspired to overturn an election.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostYou know what you do when your threatened, you cooperate, you don't plead guilty if you're innocent. Flynn pleaded guilty because he knew the Feds had the goods on him, not because he was framed. You've got to be a real tin foil hat rube to believe that the entire U.S. Intel conspired to overturn an election.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostIt's not rare at all for that to happen in "copping a plea", when it looks like you might not win a bigger issue. Sometimes, however, that "bigger issue" gets new factors (new evidence comes to light, exculpatory evidence was suppressed, etc) and the 'need' to plead guilty evaporates.
How bout we watch how this unfolds?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by JimLamebrain View PostWhen did you come to the realization that all of the U.S Intel agencies were corrupt, MM? Wasn't when Trump told it was so was it? Lemming!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostOr you plead guilty because you've been framed, and you and your family are threatened with financial ruin if you don't cooperate. You need to pay attention, Jimmy, because that's exactly what happened, and Attorney Powell has the evidence to prove it. But you don't have to take my word for it. Follow the links I helpfully provided in previous posts and look at the facts for yourself.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostYou think cleaning up the corruption in our intelligence services somehow serves Putin's interests more than a criminal conspiracy to run a duly elected president out of office?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostIt happens.
Yes, it's not civil and it's not criminal. It's entirely political. It is a process initiated by politicians against a politician (in the case of POTUS) judged by politicians, using rules created by politicians, for political reasons, with political considerations directing the path.
Entirely political.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostThe Texas Ranger Motto -- "Always do what's right and accept the consequences".Chuck Norris approves this message.
24643610302f9a9a14e7051952415a3b--chuck-norris-walker-texas-ranger.jpg
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostRandom observation, but isn't it funny how these kinds of threads always seem to move in the opposite direction of their intent? This one started out claiming that we have proof positive of quid pro quo, but as we've taken a closer look at the testimony and evidence being presented, it turns out the opposite is true, and come to find out, certain members of the Obama administration are in this thing up to their necks!
Leave a comment:
-
Random observation, but isn't it funny how these kinds of threads always seem to move in the opposite direction of their intent? This one started out claiming that we have proof positive of quid pro quo, but as we've taken a closer look at the testimony and evidence being presented, it turns out the opposite is true, and come to find out, certain members of the Obama administration are in this thing up to their necks!
Leave a comment:
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, 03-27-2024, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
159 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
53 responses
400 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 11:32 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
114 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
198 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Yesterday, 07:43 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
84 responses
373 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by JimL
Yesterday, 11:08 AM
|
Leave a comment: