Take This Impeachment And Shove It...

[rogue06]

Perjury actually has a legal definition, Jim. If that were true, the Democrats could have impeached him on that, because it's an actual CRIME, as opposed to the goofy made up stuff they got from their focus group.

You're wrong again.

Yup. Lying under oath. Which was Clinton did wrt to Paula Jones lawsuit and not, as the Democrats and MSM keep deliberately misinforming everyone, anything to do with his affair with Lewinsky.

[rogue06]

So, just like the impeachment sham, the ONLY thing bipartisan about the impeachment VOTE (so far) is that DEMOCRATS crossed over to vote with Republicans.

I know, Jim --- that means that those Democrats are... what do you call it?.... unprincipled?

So much for Pelosi's vow to only impeach when there was clear bipartisan support for it.

[firstfloor]

So much for Pelosi's vow to only impeach when there was clear bipartisan support for it.

I think she might be working on that. The crime is still in progress.

[Watermelon]

So, just like the impeachment sham, the ONLY thing bipartisan about the impeachment VOTE (so far) is that DEMOCRATS crossed over to vote with Republicans.

I know, Jim --- that means that those Democrats are... what do you call it?.... unprincipled?

[firstfloor]

In the Senate, the Banana Repubs will work hand in glove with the Tyrant to ensure his continued despotic rule.

[Teallaura]

He's an independent - a former Republican does not create 'bipartisan' support. My understanding is he caucuses with the Democrats now which would, if we are lumping him into a party despite his own assertion of independence, make him a Democrat.

[Mountain Man]

It sounds like Pelosi is going to park it for a while.

It may not matter...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-constitution/

[Mountain Man]

In the Senate, the Banana Repubs will work hand in glove with the Tyrant to ensure his continued despotic rule.

[Watermelon]

Perjury actually has a legal definition, Jim. If that were true, the Democrats could have impeached him on that, because it's an actual CRIME, as opposed to the goofy made up stuff they got from their focus group.

You're wrong again.

[firstfloor]

Sweet.

[firstfloor]

True to form!

[firstfloor]

It may not matter...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-constitution/

Assuming this is correct, Pelosi could simply write a new article of impeachment after the Senate trial, and keep going in that fashion. Trump could be the first President to be permanently impeached.

[Mountain Man]

Assuming this is correct, Pelosi could simply write a new article of impeachment after the Senate trial, and keep going in that fashion. Trump could be the first President to be permanently impeached.

Why not? It would simply drive home what a sham this whole thing is.

May God continue to bless President Donald Trump and the beautiful First Lady.

[Cow Poke]

The 17 witnesses were compelling nevertheless. ...

So compelling that, the more the American people heard what they had to say, the less enthusiastic they were to support impeachment.

[Cow Poke]

So much for Pelosi's vow to only impeach when there was clear bipartisan support for it.

She, um... got kidnapped... um.. had a gun to her head... um... she suddenly believed the crap her colleagues were throwing against the wall in the hopes that something - ANYTHING - would stick.