MSNBC Guest Advises: 'Destroy' Most Whites Over Their Supporting Trump

[One Bad Pig]

American Revolution.

We were under a monarchy then.

[Cow Poke]

I never have nor will I ever encourage physical violence as a legitimate part of democracy.

American Revolution.

[Bill the Cat]

Correct, I don't know his history. I was going by the linked video. I'm assuming just almost no one else commenting in this thread knew his history. Did you?

Yes. I've seen him SEVERAL times on MSNBC. He simply hates whites and every word out of his mouth is directed at how racist whites are.

Is this supposed to be a counter-point to my opinion that he was not referring to physically beating people up in the OP?

No. It was a bit of more information on his utter hatred of whites. And, as I've repeated in this thread, it CAN be mistaken for a call to violence, and when coupled with his prior anti-white racism, is a dog whistle.

If so, can you maybe quote the bit in the article where you believer he's promoting violence? I skimmed it, and he seems to be saying the opposite of that,

"There is no justice for black people. And yet violently revolting against the system will get us nowhere. ... Jury nullification at least has the benefit of being non-violent. Understand, when cops — when the armed forces of the state — can shoot me for no reason and get away with it, I am no longer living in a civil society. I’m living in the state of nature, and I have a natural right to defend myself by any means necessary. But I’m not here advocating a violent response to systematic injustice (because we’d lose). Violence has a tendency to be indiscriminate, anyway."

Never intended it to be about his call to violence. Just noting the possibility that someone unstable CAN take it that way.

[Leonhard]

I never have nor will I ever encourage physical violence as a legitimate part of democracy.

[Cow Poke]

His remarks often are -- but we don't get a vote... unless... we self-identify as black.

I had chitlins for breakfast before we did our "donuts and blessings" at local schools.

[rogue06]

Isn't that a bit racist?

His remarks often are -- but we don't get a vote... unless... we self-identify as black.

[Cow Poke]

Sorry, as Mystal has proclaimed: "Whites don't get a vote" on what's racist.

Isn't that a bit racist?

[rogue06]

Because he's a racist.

Sorry, as Mystal has proclaimed: "Whites don't get a vote" on what's racist.

[Adrift]

Then you don't know his history.

Correct, I don't know his history. I was going by the linked video. I'm assuming just almost no one else commenting in this thread knew his history. Did you?

https://abovethelaw.com/2016/12/here...ustice-system/

Is this supposed to be a counter-point to my opinion that he was not referring to physically beating people up in the OP? If so, can you maybe quote the bit in the article where you believer he's promoting violence? I skimmed it, and he seems to be saying the opposite of that,

"There is no justice for black people. And yet violently revolting against the system will get us nowhere. ... Jury nullification at least has the benefit of being non-violent. Understand, when cops — when the armed forces of the state — can shoot me for no reason and get away with it, I am no longer living in a civil society. I’m living in the state of nature, and I have a natural right to defend myself by any means necessary. But I’m not here advocating a violent response to systematic injustice (because we’d lose). Violence has a tendency to be indiscriminate, anyway."

[rogue06]

Unless they're wearing MAGA hats, of course.

Well, they're "asking for it."

[rogue06]

What else would you expect from someone who is an editor for a group that calls itself "Above the Law"?

[KingsGambit]

Then you don't know his history.

https://abovethelaw.com/2016/12/here...ustice-system/

What am I missing there? The only reference I could find to violent action was in the negative:

But I’m not here advocating a violent response to systematic injustice (because we’d lose). Violence has a tendency to be indiscriminate, anyway.

[Sparko]

Then you don't know his history.

https://abovethelaw.com/2016/12/here...ustice-system/

[Bill the Cat]

I watched the video. I sincerely think you're all seeing this in a MUCH worse light than it is. He wasn't referring to physically beating people.

Then you don't know his history. ### Edit to add*** There's some profanity in the article.

https://abovethelaw.com/2016/12/here...ustice-system/

[Bill the Cat]

I was responding to the specific claim that he had never promoted/condoned violence.

I should have been more specific. I mean unprovoked violence like shooting people. This is not a call to unprovoked violence:

"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them"