Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Shoot an 84yr old pro-lifer? No jail for you.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post

    That you are focussed on ad hom against your perception of my motive instead of the argument you claim is 'weak' would say otherwise. People only need to resort to ad hom when they don't have an argument against the argument presented in the post.

    So - do you have anything to say that is a counter to my argument the violence is on both sides, or that the lax sentencing is due to a lax attitude towards gun violence?
    When I notice that someone is deliberately padding their claims, it tends to make those claims all the less trustworthy.

    When you have the facts on your side, you don't have to do such things. In fact it is counter productive.

    PRO TIP: If you want people to look at your claims, don't fake it. You deserve to have them summarily dismissed when you do.

    I'm always still in trouble again

    "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
    "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
    "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
      When I notice that someone is deliberately padding their claims, it tends to make those claims all the less trustworthy.

      When you have the facts on your side, you don't have to do such things. In fact it is counter productive.

      PRO TIP: If you want people to look at your claims, don't fake it. You deserve to have them summarily dismissed when you do.
      I wasn't padding my post, one doesn't need to pad a post about violence by conservatives especially on the issue of abortion.

      Now - do you have any actual arguments that counter my points: (1) There is violence is on both sides, (2) that the lax sentencing in this case is due to a lax attitude towards gun violence?
      My brethren, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal favoritism. James 2:1

      If anyone thinks himself to be religious, and yet does not  bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this man’s religion is worthless James 1:26

      This you know, my beloved brethren. But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger; James 1:19

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post

        I wasn't padding my post, one doesn't need to pad a post about violence by conservatives especially on the issue of abortion.

        Now - do you have any actual arguments that counter my points: (1) There is violence is on both sides, (2) that the lax sentencing in this case is due to a lax attitude towards gun violence?
        The same judge sentenced a woman in 2016 to 6 months to be served consecutively for each the charge of felony charge of animal – killing/torturing and the charger possession of a firearm while under the influence of alcohol. Seems the judge has more care about gun violence towards an animal than a pro-life campaigner.
        P1) If , then I win.

        P2)

        C) I win.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post

          I wasn't padding my post, one doesn't need to pad a post about violence by conservatives especially on the issue of abortion.

          Now - do you have any actual arguments that counter my points: (1) There is violence is on both sides, (2) that the lax sentencing in this case is due to a lax attitude towards gun violence?
          With apologies to Jeff Foxworthy...

          When you start off listing the names of two folks from three decades ago, one of which had absolutely nothing to do with abortion... You might be a post padder.


          If Rudolph committed his crimes today, would the FBI be able to catch him? After all it took place after dark, which according to old Joe's Attorney General Merrick Garland, makes it impossible to successfully investigate any of the nearly 200 attacks on Crisis Pregnancy Centers in roughly half the states in the country.

          I'm always still in trouble again

          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

          Comment

          Related Threads

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 05:01 PM
          11 responses
          36 views
          0 likes
          Last Post Diogenes  
          Started by Gondwanaland, Today, 12:29 PM
          3 responses
          28 views
          0 likes
          Last Post Gondwanaland  
          Started by seer, Yesterday, 09:39 AM
          13 responses
          114 views
          0 likes
          Last Post Roy
          by Roy
           
          Started by Starlight, 09-20-2023, 07:58 PM
          23 responses
          20 views
          1 like
          Last Post Diogenes  
          Started by seer, 09-20-2023, 09:34 AM
          3 responses
          44 views
          1 like
          Last Post seer
          by seer
           
          Working...
          X