This was about to derail another thread...
Unfortunately, I do know one QAnon subscriber, and that's my hare-brained brother. I'll be having a normal conversation with him and he'll launch into some creepy commentary about how rich elitists are having children kidnapped so they can abuse, torture and kill them. When I ask him what evidence he has to support this, he just says that they are evil and bored and this is how they get their kicks (which obviously is not evidence). He claims they support the porous southern border because that's how they get their victims without getting on the radar. He connects a lot of this in with Jeffrey Epstein and says this is why his client list hasn't been divulged and why he was murdered in jail.
I can agree about suspicious events without concocting elaborate illogical conspiracy theories. My bro can't.
On a totally different subject, I had a good friend who was a CPA who was a 'normal good Christian' in every sense of the word, intelligent, successful.... but he had this bug up his butt about the Moon Landings. He was absolutely convinced it was all a hoax, and had all kinds of "proof" in his office that anybody with any objectivity at all would recognize as circumstantial at best. It became clear it wasn't worth anybody's effort to argue against him on this.
AND ... a supervisor I had back in the 1990s. A very intelligent guy; I was impressed with his diagnostic skills. But he was convinced that AIDS was created by shadowy whites in government in an attempt to kill off inner-city blacks. When I challenged him on that, he'd run off in all directions, name dropping people I'd never heard of (except for Louis Farrakhan). He went completely emotional on the subject and couldn't be reasoned with, so I gave up.
It's easy to get sucked in, and for confirmation bias to "seal the deal". I have a few very good close friends "from the opposite side of the aisle" who will allow me to sit with them and run my latest possible conspiracy theory by them. The most recent was the Social Emotional Learning thing. When they were trying to show me how SEL is actually a "good thing", we were all surprised that the ISD removed any mention of SEL from their public facing website after I raised the issue at a school board meeting.
If it's such a good thing, why hide it when attention was called to it?
Now, even they are suspicious, though not quite willing to admit SEL is "bad".
Originally posted by Ronson
View Post
Unfortunately, I do know one QAnon subscriber, and that's my hare-brained brother. I'll be having a normal conversation with him and he'll launch into some creepy commentary about how rich elitists are having children kidnapped so they can abuse, torture and kill them. When I ask him what evidence he has to support this, he just says that they are evil and bored and this is how they get their kicks (which obviously is not evidence). He claims they support the porous southern border because that's how they get their victims without getting on the radar. He connects a lot of this in with Jeffrey Epstein and says this is why his client list hasn't been divulged and why he was murdered in jail.
I can agree about suspicious events without concocting elaborate illogical conspiracy theories. My bro can't.
Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
On a totally different subject, I had a good friend who was a CPA who was a 'normal good Christian' in every sense of the word, intelligent, successful.... but he had this bug up his butt about the Moon Landings. He was absolutely convinced it was all a hoax, and had all kinds of "proof" in his office that anybody with any objectivity at all would recognize as circumstantial at best. It became clear it wasn't worth anybody's effort to argue against him on this.
Originally posted by Ronson
View Post
AND ... a supervisor I had back in the 1990s. A very intelligent guy; I was impressed with his diagnostic skills. But he was convinced that AIDS was created by shadowy whites in government in an attempt to kill off inner-city blacks. When I challenged him on that, he'd run off in all directions, name dropping people I'd never heard of (except for Louis Farrakhan). He went completely emotional on the subject and couldn't be reasoned with, so I gave up.
Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
It's easy to get sucked in, and for confirmation bias to "seal the deal". I have a few very good close friends "from the opposite side of the aisle" who will allow me to sit with them and run my latest possible conspiracy theory by them. The most recent was the Social Emotional Learning thing. When they were trying to show me how SEL is actually a "good thing", we were all surprised that the ISD removed any mention of SEL from their public facing website after I raised the issue at a school board meeting.
If it's such a good thing, why hide it when attention was called to it?
Now, even they are suspicious, though not quite willing to admit SEL is "bad".
Comment