WHO goes Woke...

[seer]

So much for science!

World Health Organization now says gender 'exists on a continuum' and is 'beyond non-binary'

Gender is 'not limited to male or female,' the WHO says

The World Health Organization will update its gender guidance to reflect its belief that gender goes "beyond non-binary," the organization has announced.

The WHO has an existing "gender mainstreaming manual" which argues that there are many genders existing on a spectrum from male to female. The organization now says that does not go far enough, however.

The updated guidance will focus on "highlighting and expanding on the concept of intersectionality, which looks at how gender power dynamics interact with other hierarchies of privilege or disadvantage, resulting in inequality and differential health outcomes for different people," the WHO website reads at the time of reporting.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/world-...ond-non-binary

[Mountain Man]

This is very much the same way that homosexuality was changed from a psychological disorder to merely a sexual preference in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as maintained by the American Psychiatric Association. They bowed to intimidation from homosexual groups and changed the diagnosis without any regard for science or academic debate.

[seer]

This is very much the same way that homosexuality was changed from a psychological disorder to merely a sexual preference in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as maintained by the American Psychiatric Association. They bowed to intimidation from homosexual groups and changed the diagnosis without any regard for science or academic debate.

Yep, it is all political...

[Gondwanaland]

So much for science!

World Health Organization now says gender 'exists on a continuum' and is 'beyond non-binary'

Gender is 'not limited to male or female,' the WHO says

The World Health Organization will update its gender guidance to reflect its belief that gender goes "beyond non-binary," the organization has announced.

The WHO has an existing "gender mainstreaming manual" which argues that there are many genders existing on a spectrum from male to female. The organization now says that does not go far enough, however.

The updated guidance will focus on "highlighting and expanding on the concept of intersectionality, which looks at how gender power dynamics interact with other hierarchies of privilege or disadvantage, resulting in inequality and differential health outcomes for different people," the WHO website reads at the time of reporting.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/world-...ond-non-binary

To be fair WHO abandoned science back when it shilled for China at the start of the pandemic and then as it went on and they tried to reject the lab origin of the virus. So their continuance is not surprising

But yeah, more and more supposed scientists are rejecting basic science and hitching themselves to pseudoscientific garbage (the idea of gender outside of linguistics is a nonscientific concept created by a truly perverse and evil man, John Money)

[tabibito]

This is very much the same way that homosexuality was changed from a psychological disorder to merely a sexual preference in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders as maintained by the American Psychiatric Association. They bowed to intimidation from homosexual groups and changed the diagnosis without any regard for science or academic debate.

Was it intimidation or stacking? If I remember rightly, intimidation wasn't much in evidence prior to that change.

[seer]

To be fair WHO abandoned science back when it shilled for China at the start of the pandemic and then as it went on and they tried to reject the lab origin of the virus. So their continuance is not surprising

But yeah, more and more supposed scientists are rejecting basic science and hitching themselves to pseudoscientific garbage (the idea of gender outside of linguistics is a nonscientific concept created by a truly perverse and evil man, John Money)

Yes, John Money was an evil SOB...

[Mountain Man]

Was it intimidation or stacking? If I remember rightly, intimidation wasn't much in evidence prior to that change.

It was both, I think.

[seer]

Law Professor Melts Down When Sen. Hawley Asks Her If Men Can Get Pregnant

[Mountain Man]

Law Professor Melts Down When Sen. Hawley Asks Her If Men Can Get Pregnant

It was the other way around. When he asked if the term "person with the capacity to become pregant" referred to women, she accused him of denying the existence of transpeople. He asked how. She replied, "Do you believe men can get pregnant?" He responed, "No I don't think men can get pregnant." She smugly retorted, "So you just denied that transpeople exist. Thank you!"

[seer]

It was the other way around. When he asked if the term "person with the capacity to become pregant" referred to women, she accused him of denying the existence of transpeople. He asked how. She replied, "Do you believe men can get pregnant?" He responed, "No I don't think men can get pregnant." She smugly retorted, "So you just denied that transpeople exist. Thank you!"

I don't agree, he made her look like a fool...

[Mountain Man]

I don't agree, he made her look like a fool...

You don't agree with what? I wasn't defending her. When I said "It was the opposite," I meant only that she asked him if men could get pregnant, and not that he asked her. You're right, he did make her look like an idiot. She never actually answered his question and instead attacked him for even asking it.

[Starlight]

I take it that the option that the WHO scientists and doctors are right and that you ideologically-driven lunatics are wrong isn't on the table for consideration?

[seer]

I take it that the option that the WHO scientists and doctors are right and that you ideologically-driven lunatics are wrong isn't on the table for consideration?

Like the WHO never did anything that was politically expedient!

[Mountain Man]

I take it that the option that the WHO scientists and doctors are right and that you ideologically-driven lunatics are wrong isn't on the table for consideration?

The WHO "scientists" are the ideologically-driven lunatics.

[Gondwanaland]

I take it that the option that the WHO scientists and doctors are right and that you ideologically-driven lunatics are wrong isn't on the table for consideration?

Correct. Because they're the lunatics that think men can get pregnant. Basic biology, which they deny, says they're wrong.