Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, leaves issue up to states

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rogue06
    replied
    Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
    And now State Attorney Andrew Warren runs afoul of notorious fascist Gov. Ron DeSantis.

    This is another example of the evil that is done for the pleasure of Christians.
    Liberal prosecutors refusing to enforce the law are a blight on this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • firstfloor
    replied
    And now State Attorney Andrew Warren runs afoul of notorious fascist Gov. Ron DeSantis.

    This is another example of the evil that is done for the pleasure of Christians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by Teallaura View Post

    I agree with CD - it's a strawman. It's just THEIR strawman and knocking it over doesn't actually do anything.
    I just find it hilariously ironic that their "punishment" is exactly what we wanted in the first place: responsible sex, which would mean there was no need for Roe v Wade or 'convenience' abortions.
    We have been telling them for years to just keep their pants on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Teallaura
    replied
    I agree with CD - it's a strawman. It's just THEIR strawman and knocking it over doesn't actually do anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Originally posted by CivilDiscourse View Post

    It's a strawman, but I love the concept of "It's not about promiscuity, and to show you I'm going to stop sleeping around!"
    Strawman?

    https://nypost.com/2022/06/25/abstin...v-wade-ruling/

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...oe-v-Wade.html

    https://aninjusticemag.com/theres-on...n-1a62c5998506

    Leave a comment:


  • CivilDiscourse
    replied
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    Liberals owning Conservatives:

    owning-repubs.jpg
    It's a strawman, but I love the concept of "It's not about promiscuity, and to show you I'm going to stop sleeping around!"

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparko
    replied
    Liberals owning Conservatives:

    owning-repubs.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Powerful.

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    787cbc03-f5b9-4efd-9f0f-ab73e34156e2.jpg

    Leave a comment:


  • NorrinRadd
    replied
    I'd kind of like it to be mandatory nationwide that all medical professionals be bound by the "secular" portions of the Hippocratic Oath.

    Leave a comment:


  • rogue06
    replied
    Originally posted by firstfloor View Post

    Doctors are regulated surely. Or are you insisting on fascist oversight?
    The law used to require a second doctor be on hand to make sure that the law was followed and to look out for the baby in case the doctor botched the abortion and the baby was born alive[1].

    In ff's world that constituted "fascist oversight"





    1. abortionists have this nasty desire to "finish the job" when a baby survives being aborted, which is straight out homicide, and is why a second doctor was required. One that would be there to defend the baby.

    Yeah, the very epitome of fascism

    Leave a comment:


  • Cow Poke
    replied
    Originally posted by firstfloor View Post

    Doctors are regulated surely.
    By other doctors. And don't call me surely! (works better when spoken)

    Or are you insisting on fascist oversight?
    Yes, that's exactly what he's saying.



    Leave a comment:


  • firstfloor
    replied
    Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
    If you strip any and all penalties for ignoring the "law" and eliminated the oversight that would call out any violations, you have thereby legalized it no matter how much they want to pretend to the contrary. Otherwise, there would have been nothing to "celebrate."
    Doctors are regulated surely. Or are you insisting on fascist oversight?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Originally posted by dirtfloor View Post

    Yes. Blue states and Red states who hate each other. Definitely not United States. The difference more defined now by the SCOTUS ruling. Could SCOTUS itself split into SCOTRS and SCOTBS?
    SCOTBS would be a fitting abbreviation for a liberal leaning court.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hypatia_Alexandria
    replied
    Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
    Good job impeaching your own source.

    SCOTUS nominees make a point of never promising to rule on hypothetical cases or even actual cases working their way toward the Supreme Court. For one thing they would have to recuse themselves if they did so. Politicians from both sides do their best to get them to do so but none ever do.
    I never employed the word "promising". And what Schaeffer, in his brief interview, opined might occur was later intimated by Thomas.

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 02:30 PM
3 responses
20 views
0 likes
Last Post CivilDiscourse  
Started by rogue06, Today, 11:58 AM
5 responses
53 views
0 likes
Last Post seanD
by seanD
 
Started by KingsGambit, 12-04-2022, 06:54 PM
13 responses
108 views
0 likes
Last Post Gondwanaland  
Started by oxmixmudd, 12-04-2022, 05:55 PM
248 responses
1,217 views
0 likes
Last Post Cow Poke  
Started by Cow Poke, 12-03-2022, 04:59 PM
1 response
26 views
2 likes
Last Post Teallaura  
Working...
X