Biden's daughter and taking showers with her father

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Actually, there was far more than that, and you know it - and you defended this moral depravity to the hilt. They're you're people!

No mention of anybody waving his genitals "in a child's face".

[Cow Poke]

No mention of anybody waving his genitals "in a child's face".

Your moral depravity forces you to hide behind semantics. You defended this debauchery at every turn. Again, these are your people.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Your moral depravity forces you to hide behind semantics. You defended this debauchery at every turn. Again, these are your people.

My integrity demonstrates that the allegations made here about a man waving his genitalia "in a child's face" were false.

As were the allegations [also made on these boards] concerning the recent Texas Drag event wherein, so it was claimed, children were putting dollar bills into the thongs/g-strings of various drag performers.

None of the performers on the video footage that I found on sites condemning that event were wearing thongs or g-strings.

However, that did not prevent those of a certain mind-set who post here from accepting the allegations as veracious.

[Maranatha]

My integrity demonstrates that...

Oh wow, it's worse than I thought..

[tabibito]

Your moral depravity forces you to hide behind semantics. You defended this debauchery at every turn. Again, these are your people.

I think H_A might have a point here. No-one in his right mind would (literally) wave his genitals in front of a child's face - children have teeth.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

I think H_A might have a point here. No-one in his right mind would (literally) wave his genitals in front of a child's face - children have teeth.

As do older babies - as every breast-feeding mother knows!

[Cow Poke]

I think H_A might have a point here. No-one in his right mind would (literally) wave his genitals in front of a child's face - children have teeth.

So, I wonder... is it proximity? Would she be opposed to a man literally waving his genitals in the face of a child? (I wouldn't be surprised if she thought that was acceptable)

But, assuming she'd think that inappropriate, at what distance is it OK? Is it really a matter of proximity?
20 yards away is OK? 6 feet?

Reminds me of the joke about the man asking a woman if she would have sex with him for a Million dollars, and she said she might.
He asked, "how bout $40".
She snapped back, "what do you think I am, a PROSTITUTE?"
He answered, "Madam, we have already established that fact, now we're just negotiating price".

[Sparko]

Yes, she was also traumatized by being turned on when she wasn't supposed to be, having her ears cleaned, and hearing her parents have sex.


Sorry, it was being sexually molested that she couldn't remember.



No, that's not my argument. You don't have to be a professional psychologist to know if you are suffering from mental issues. But not everyone can identify the root causes of their mental issues. And she lists things which should not have been the cause of her problems, which makes me doubt her ability in particular to do so.

You realize how psychologists and therapists work right? They find the "root cause" by asking you to tell them. Of course someone can know what is causing their mental anguish/issues. It's their brain and their life after all. Not all trauma is buried and has to be dug out like you see in TV dramas.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

So, I wonder... is it proximity? Would she be opposed to a man literally waving his genitals in the face of a child? (I wouldn't be surprised if she thought that was acceptable)

Of course "a man literally waving his genitals in the face of a child " would be totally unacceptable. However, in your anecdote that never happened.

[Cow Poke]

Of course "a man literally waving his genitals in the face of a child " would be totally unacceptable. However, in your anecdote that never happened.

So, at what distance does it become acceptable?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

So, at what distance does it become acceptable?

From the way you described the event and that they then threw candy "at the children" would suggest they were several meters away.

[Cow Poke]

From the way you described the event and that they then threw candy "at the children" would suggest they were several meters away.

At what point is it acceptable? "several meters"? One meter?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

At what point is it acceptable? "several meters"? One meter?

You tell me.

However, in the anecdote you provided it does not come across as morally reprehensible, inappropriate perhaps, but not nefarious.

[Cow Poke]

You tell me.

Gladly. It's not. Ever. Only a moral degenerate would think it was acceptable at any distance.

[rogue06]

we are shocked, yes? AND stunned?

and now with "appalled" as well.


7c5fbc8e-7c74-4141-a357-c6b64a7a8f02_text.gif