Originally posted by tabibito
View Post
As is only to be expected from the name, "TransSafety," the source is set up to provide assistance to Trans-sexuals. Have to wonder why the Swedish National Board of Health would decide to base a decision on a debunked study. Could it be that the study was in reality not debunked, or perhaps, that it was only one of many studies and considerations reviewed by the Swedish Board of Health.
3Health Liberation now - Littman Tries to Prove ROGD by Surveying Detransitioners, Fails Spectacularly.
.
Note: We are looking to connect with trans academics or researchers to develop a formal response to this paper. If this sounds like you, you can contact us here.
And also, that the ROGD study isn’t particularly relevant to the revised policy on puberty blockers. ROGD is rapid onset gender dysphoria, if you’re looking to let me save you time looking it up.
It goes on for a bit, pretty much just as frothily, starting with conspiratorial hyperbole that the questionaire supporting Littman’s study has been confirmed by Littman!
As if showing your data on request on a journal article isn’t the norm, and as if refusing to do so wouldn’t result in your paper being withdrawn from the journal. The “debunking” provides references as well, but they should have stopped at the opening note recognizing their incompetence at attempting a meaningful review.
There’s something in there about TERFs too, but that’s a rabbit I’m not gonna waste time stewing.
Bonus points that the contrary partisans to seer’s segm source by citing their supports are making an attempt at accountability, but what they’re saying isn’t true either.
Oh - sorry - there's no such thing as the Swedish Board of Health ... it is the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.
The ideal is no crap at all, and no extremism, either. In the unfortunate case that no purely objective information is available, go with the most objective source you can find. If none are available, just don’t go there.
Comment