Originally posted by oxmixmudd
View Post
Two consenting adults, engaging in sex, does not make the act immoral. I do not have moral prohibitions against pre-marital sex. So when someone says "those two consenting adults can morally have sex, but those two consenting adults cannot" and the ONLY difference between the two couples is their genitalia (i.e., different or same), then the morality is not about the act - it is about the specific people engaging in the act - in this case the specific genitalia they bring to the encounter. That means morality has just been determined by someone's genetic make-up. Therefore - this is NO different then saying "those two consenting adults can morally have sex, but those two consenting adults cannot" when the difference is race - or height - or eye color. It is inappropriate discrimination against a group by membership in a class.
Hence my position on the florist and the baker and anyone else who adopts an "anti-gay" agenda, for whatever their reason.
Comment