Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Recruitment of former military personnel by radical right-wing movements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Recruitment of former military personnel by radical right-wing movements

    An interesting article in The Conversation published on 27 January assesses the the Oath-Keepers in the USA and its recruitment drive among military veterans.

    https://theconversation.com/behind-t...ilitary-175322
    The Oath Keepers were founded by Rhodes in 2009 as an anti-government group in response to the Obama presidency. [...]

    The group’s name implies a mandate to honor their oath to the U.S. Constitution, and in particular to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

    But its founding inspiration was precisely the opposite: challenging a legitimate president and commander in chief out of animosity toward what Barack Obama stood for. Since then, the Oath Keepers have armed and broadcast plans to mobilize.

    The Oath Keepers may number in the thousands, yet we believe they present a greater threat than their membership suggests. This is partly because the Oath Keepers actively recruit current and retired members of the armed forces.

    As UMass Lowell terrorism expert and our research collaborator, Arie Perliger, has shown in his work, Oath Keepers members are likely better trained militarily than other extremist groups because of the group’s composition.

    About 10% of the Oath Keepers are active-duty military, and around two-thirds are retired military or law enforcement, according to analysis of the group’s membership by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Several Oath Keepers present at the Jan. 6 attack were veterans, such as Larry Brock, the so-called “zip-tie guy” due to his being photographed with the makeshift handcuffs.

    According to an analysis of court and Pentagon records by CNN, as many as 14% of those charged with crimes related to storming the Capitol served in the military. This is double the proportion of veterans in the general American adult population.

    Military members are desirable to extremist groups because they bring special skills such as experience with weapons, targeting and combat experience. According to the indictment, the Oath Keepers used a “stack,” or staggered military formation, to breach the Capitol.

    As our previous research demonstrated, the processes of radicalization in an extremist group movement is in many ways similar to military training. Those with military backgrounds possess not only the skills that radical groups seek, but also the psychological readiness for violent conflict that is rare among civilians.

    The rise in radicalization within the ranks of the military can be observed in the increasing proportion of domestic terrorism acts in the U.S. involving active-duty and reserve personel, from 0% in 2018 to 1.5% in 2019 and 6.4% in 2020, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    The number of Americans with military ties classified as extremists quadrupled in recent years, according to Michael Jensen and other researchers at the University of Maryland’s Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism center. An increase in radical ideology among members of the U.S. military makes it a fertile ground for recruiting by groups such as the Oath Keepers.

    A 2019 poll of active-duty troops found that around 1 in 3 (36%) reported personally witnessing “White nationalism and ideologically-driven racism” among their peers. This included the use of racist language, but also swastikas drawn on service members’ cars and stickers supporting the Ku Klux Klan.

    This high proportion reflects a significant increase from the previous year: In a 2018 poll, 1 in 5 (22%) active military troops had reported witnessing such behavior. As well as posing a risk due to their weapons training, active and former military personnel pose a greater threat as members of right-wing militia groups. Unlike civilians, military people must take an oath, pledging allegiance to their country and the institutions of democracy enshrined in the Constitution.

    When they align with groups like the Oath Keepers and plan an attack on the U.S. government, these military personnel betray their oath. This kind of hypocrisy is known in psychology as cognitive dissonance – an uncomfortable psychological state that arises when one’s actions contradict one’s self-image, causing a motivation to “double-down” to justify one’s actions. It is the reason that painful, embarrassing or humiliating initiation rites are often effective in radicalizing new members. The additional psychological cost of cognitive dissonance may mean military members of the Oath Keepers are more committed to their new allegiance after they turn away from their old one.


    What was also of interest is the way women are being used by this group to recruit, disseminate propaganda, and raise funds. This, as the article notes,

    The hidden face of extremism is often female, as our previous research on the subject has shown. In Jihadi groups, women were crucial for fundraising, disseminating propaganda and recruiting men for the cause. Women in Jihadi organizations, like al-Qaeda recruiter Malika el Aroud, were able to shame men into participating in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    On her website, minbar.sos, Aroud exhorted men to step up to prove that they were real men.

    We see comparable dynamics in American right-wing extremist groups and the ways in which women weaponize toxic masculinity.


    While some believe that with with indictments the appeal of this group may decline it nonetheless is of concern that although the leaders may end up in jail, the recruitment of men and women to this organisation may well continue.

    In the UK a group known as Alpha Men Assemble [a predominantly anti-vax organisation] is likewise turning to recruiting former military personnel and promoting violence. In the UK anti-vaxxers have targeted many schools and at least one Covid testing site

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...style-militias

    The AMA is also openly seeking UK veterans, an approach that overlaps with US militia activities. Telegram messages suggest a number of ex-service personnel have already joined. One, referencing a scene from the dystopian film The Matrix, calls himself a “red pilled veteran”. Another states: “I’m English. Ex RAF. My mission statement was a ‘force for good’. I believed in that.”


    That article also notes:

    Recent posts from the AMA’s official Telegram channel, which has 7,000 subscribers, encourage members to adopt anti-surveillance techniques by using “burner phones” and advise people to “communicate off line” with CB and ham radios.

    Other posts seen by the Observer promise supporters that “you will be taught self-defence at each AMA meeting” with “professional men” and told to “aquire [sic] a black style uniform”.


    That such extreme organisations are appealing to former military personnel [and their skills] in their attempts to challenge democratic governments has some very disturbing historical parallels.

    One wonders if Rhodes going to write his very own Mein Kampf if he ends up behind bars.
    "It ain't necessarily so
    The things that you're liable
    To read in the Bible
    It ain't necessarily so
    ."

    Sportin' Life
    Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

  • #2
    And groups like BLM recruit criminals, thugs and arsonists.
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
      An interesting article in The Conversation published on 27 January assesses the the Oath-Keepers in the USA and its recruitment drive among military veterans.

      https://theconversation.com/behind-t...ilitary-175322
      The Oath Keepers were founded by Rhodes in 2009 as an anti-government group in response to the Obama presidency. [...]

      The group’s name implies a mandate to honor their oath to the U.S. Constitution, and in particular to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

      But its founding inspiration was precisely the opposite: challenging a legitimate president and commander in chief out of animosity toward what Barack Obama stood for. Since then, the Oath Keepers have armed and broadcast plans to mobilize.

      The Oath Keepers may number in the thousands, yet we believe they present a greater threat than their membership suggests. This is partly because the Oath Keepers actively recruit current and retired members of the armed forces.

      As UMass Lowell terrorism expert and our research collaborator, Arie Perliger, has shown in his work, Oath Keepers members are likely better trained militarily than other extremist groups because of the group’s composition.

      About 10% of the Oath Keepers are active-duty military, and around two-thirds are retired military or law enforcement, according to analysis of the group’s membership by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Several Oath Keepers present at the Jan. 6 attack were veterans, such as Larry Brock, the so-called “zip-tie guy” due to his being photographed with the makeshift handcuffs.

      According to an analysis of court and Pentagon records by CNN, as many as 14% of those charged with crimes related to storming the Capitol served in the military. This is double the proportion of veterans in the general American adult population.

      Military members are desirable to extremist groups because they bring special skills such as experience with weapons, targeting and combat experience. According to the indictment, the Oath Keepers used a “stack,” or staggered military formation, to breach the Capitol.

      As our previous research demonstrated, the processes of radicalization in an extremist group movement is in many ways similar to military training. Those with military backgrounds possess not only the skills that radical groups seek, but also the psychological readiness for violent conflict that is rare among civilians.

      The rise in radicalization within the ranks of the military can be observed in the increasing proportion of domestic terrorism acts in the U.S. involving active-duty and reserve personel, from 0% in 2018 to 1.5% in 2019 and 6.4% in 2020, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

      The number of Americans with military ties classified as extremists quadrupled in recent years, according to Michael Jensen and other researchers at the University of Maryland’s Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism center. An increase in radical ideology among members of the U.S. military makes it a fertile ground for recruiting by groups such as the Oath Keepers.

      A 2019 poll of active-duty troops found that around 1 in 3 (36%) reported personally witnessing “White nationalism and ideologically-driven racism” among their peers. This included the use of racist language, but also swastikas drawn on service members’ cars and stickers supporting the Ku Klux Klan.

      This high proportion reflects a significant increase from the previous year: In a 2018 poll, 1 in 5 (22%) active military troops had reported witnessing such behavior. As well as posing a risk due to their weapons training, active and former military personnel pose a greater threat as members of right-wing militia groups. Unlike civilians, military people must take an oath, pledging allegiance to their country and the institutions of democracy enshrined in the Constitution.

      When they align with groups like the Oath Keepers and plan an attack on the U.S. government, these military personnel betray their oath. This kind of hypocrisy is known in psychology as cognitive dissonance – an uncomfortable psychological state that arises when one’s actions contradict one’s self-image, causing a motivation to “double-down” to justify one’s actions. It is the reason that painful, embarrassing or humiliating initiation rites are often effective in radicalizing new members. The additional psychological cost of cognitive dissonance may mean military members of the Oath Keepers are more committed to their new allegiance after they turn away from their old one.


      What was also of interest is the way women are being used by this group to recruit, disseminate propaganda, and raise funds. This, as the article notes,

      The hidden face of extremism is often female, as our previous research on the subject has shown. In Jihadi groups, women were crucial for fundraising, disseminating propaganda and recruiting men for the cause. Women in Jihadi organizations, like al-Qaeda recruiter Malika el Aroud, were able to shame men into participating in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

      On her website, minbar.sos, Aroud exhorted men to step up to prove that they were real men.

      We see comparable dynamics in American right-wing extremist groups and the ways in which women weaponize toxic masculinity.


      While some believe that with with indictments the appeal of this group may decline it nonetheless is of concern that although the leaders may end up in jail, the recruitment of men and women to this organisation may well continue.

      In the UK a group known as Alpha Men Assemble [a predominantly anti-vax organisation] is likewise turning to recruiting former military personnel and promoting violence. In the UK anti-vaxxers have targeted many schools and at least one Covid testing site

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...style-militias

      The AMA is also openly seeking UK veterans, an approach that overlaps with US militia activities. Telegram messages suggest a number of ex-service personnel have already joined. One, referencing a scene from the dystopian film The Matrix, calls himself a “red pilled veteran”. Another states: “I’m English. Ex RAF. My mission statement was a ‘force for good’. I believed in that.”


      That article also notes:

      Recent posts from the AMA’s official Telegram channel, which has 7,000 subscribers, encourage members to adopt anti-surveillance techniques by using “burner phones” and advise people to “communicate off line” with CB and ham radios.

      Other posts seen by the Observer promise supporters that “you will be taught self-defence at each AMA meeting” with “professional men” and told to “aquire [sic] a black style uniform”.


      That such extreme organisations are appealing to former military personnel [and their skills] in their attempts to challenge democratic governments has some very disturbing historical parallels.

      One wonders if Rhodes going to write his very own Mein Kampf if he ends up behind bars.
      The fact is that extremist groups very aggressively try to recruit both former and current members in the military (ISIS does it for instance). For some odd reason the MSM is only concerned when it is those on the right doing it and are as quiet as church mice when the left does it.

      I'm always still in trouble again

      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
        And groups like BLM recruit criminals, thugs and arsonists.
        Are they ex military "criminals, thugs, and arsonists"?
        "It ain't necessarily so
        The things that you're liable
        To read in the Bible
        It ain't necessarily so
        ."

        Sportin' Life
        Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
          The fact is that extremist groups very aggressively try to recruit both former and current members in the military (ISIS does it for instance).For some odd reason the MSM is only concerned when it is those on the right doing it and are as quiet as church mice when the left does it.
          The question you would need to address is how many left-wing groups are actively recruiting ex-military personnel and/or offer "self defence" with "professional men"?

          "It ain't necessarily so
          The things that you're liable
          To read in the Bible
          It ain't necessarily so
          ."

          Sportin' Life
          Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

            Are they ex military "criminals, thugs, and arsonists"?
            How would I know that? There certainly can be ex-military who have liberal agendas, but it seems that the majority of them would lean conservative.

            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
              The fact is that extremist groups very aggressively try to recruit both former and current members in the military (ISIS does it for instance). For some odd reason the MSM is only concerned when it is those on the right doing it and are as quiet as church mice when the left does it.
              And they'll paint some 'bad guy' as a conservative or religious extremist at the drop of a hat just because. When it's shown he's actually a liberal, they drop the story like Biden's old diaper.
              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • #8
                [The rise in radicalization within the ranks of the military can be observed in the increasing proportion of domestic terrorism acts in the U.S. involving active-duty and reserve personel, from 0% in 2018 to 1.5% in 2019 and 6.4% in 2020, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

                The number of Americans with military ties classified as extremists quadrupled in recent years
                What accounts for this sudden radicalisation of a previously unradicalised military?

                Oh yes ... (according to the citations)

                The hidden face of extremism is often female, as our previous research on the subject has shown. In Jihadi groups, women were crucial for fundraising, disseminating propaganda and recruiting men for the cause. Women in Jihadi organizations, like al-Qaeda recruiter Malika el Aroud, were able to shame men into participating in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
                {{and of course - cognitive dissonance.}}


                Couldn't possibly be in any part a response to provocation (real or imagined) - if the citations are to be believed, that is.

                Last edited by tabibito; 02-01-2022, 08:21 AM.
                1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                .
                ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                Scripture before Tradition:
                but that won't prevent others from
                taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                of the right to call yourself Christian.

                ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                  The fact is that extremist groups very aggressively try to recruit both former and current members in the military (ISIS does it for instance). For some odd reason the MSM is only concerned when it is those on the right doing it and are as quiet as church mice when the left does it.
                  No more than other extremist groups.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post

                    How would I know that? There certainly can be ex-military who have liberal agendas, but it seems that the majority of them would lean conservative.
                    An interesting remark.
                    "It ain't necessarily so
                    The things that you're liable
                    To read in the Bible
                    It ain't necessarily so
                    ."

                    Sportin' Life
                    Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by tabibito View Post

                      What accounts for this sudden radicalisation of a previously unradicalised military?

                      Oh yes ... (according to the citations)





                      Couldn't possibly be in any part a response to provocation (real or imagined) - if the citations are to be believed, that is.
                      I recommend you look out some of Mia Bloom's books - she is one of the authors of the article in The Conversation.

                      "It ain't necessarily so
                      The things that you're liable
                      To read in the Bible
                      It ain't necessarily so
                      ."

                      Sportin' Life
                      Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by H_A
                        "The Oath Keepers were founded by Rhodes in 2009 as an anti-government group in response to the Obama presidency....
                        But its founding inspiration was precisely the opposite: challenging a legitimate president and commander in chief out of animosity toward what Barack Obama stood for."
                        Wait. Isn't that exactly what the Democrats did for 4 years in regards to Trump? Especially the Democrats in congress? Does that make them "anti-government?"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post

                          Are they ex military "criminals, thugs, and arsonists"?
                          They're college kids typically.
                          That's what
                          - She

                          Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
                          - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

                          I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
                          - Stephen R. Donaldson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Sparko View Post

                            Wait. Isn't that exactly what the Democrats did for 4 years in regards to Trump? Especially the Democrats in congress? Does that make them "anti-government?"
                            But they claimed that he wasn't a legitimate president, so they had every right to do that.
                            1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                            .
                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                            Scripture before Tradition:
                            but that won't prevent others from
                            taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                            of the right to call yourself Christian.

                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                              And groups like BLM recruit criminals, thugs and arsonists.
                              And a large amount of child molesters, it appears. They almost rival the Catholic Church

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
                              16 responses
                              148 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post One Bad Pig  
                              Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                              53 responses
                              395 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Mountain Man  
                              Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                              25 responses
                              113 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                              33 responses
                              197 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Roy
                              by Roy
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                              84 responses
                              365 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post JimL
                              by JimL
                               
                              Working...
                              X