Dr. Oz Announces Run for Senate in Pennsylvania

[Starlight]

And even the main progressive publication in the US is calling the claim you made blatant sexism.

I don't know much about that publication. They can make insane claims if they like. I feel in no way bound to give any credence to them.

[rogue06]

I don't know much about that publication. They can make insane claims if they like. I feel in no way bound to give any credence to them.

Oooooh, the delicious unintended irony.

[Cow Poke]

Oooooh, the delicious unintended irony.

[NorrinRadd]

So, it turns out that Uncle Festerman is married to Morticia.

uncle_festerman_and_morticia.jpg

[Juvenal]

Maybe don't comment on something you don't understand.

v.

I don't know much about that publication. They can make insane claims if they like. I feel in no way bound to give any credence to them.

[Juvenal]

Oooooh, the delicious unintended irony.

Tastes sweet, doesn't it.

[Juvenal]

The source being referred to was not a person, but a political PAC, which hasn't made a lot of claims, but those it has made have been accurate in the past. Compared to say, Project Veritas, with its history of consistently false claims and edited videos.

Compared to Project Veritas, everybody looks good. That's the definition of a left-handed compliment.

Your claims are sometimes contentious, but generally a good deal more careful. At the very least, they're worth considering.

This is indefensible.

You're vouching for an unnamed political PAC, a biased source by definition, and one we're not able to check without a link. I'm not going to any trouble to dig up "dirt" that doesn't even qualify as dirt in my view. Women have abortions for lots of reasons, some more easily rationalized than others, but never without some soul searching that's deeply personal, and bright-neon "none of my business." And with very rare exceptions, they never mention it again except to the most intimate of friends.

But here's the thing I find most telling.

I don't think you think it's dirt either.