"I think we should throw those books in a fire"

[Gondwanaland]

Huh. Do me a favor and tell me where this link takes you.

That one takes me to this post:

Eww. Cooties! Get em' off me! Get 'em off! Now I need some of seer's homebrewed anti-cootie serum. I understand it's 120 proof.

Where does this one take you?
https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum...04#post1330104

[rogue06]

Oh, I'm talking about when she just says to go to a numbered post. THe post links definitely have something wrong with them, other forums they work fine and take you directly to the linked post, something with this forum/software/settings screws those links up so they only work for the person who copied them.

I learned that early on here when I did the same and provided a post link and got frustrated when someone told me it wasn't going to the post even though it did when I clicked on it (pretty sure I insulted their intelligence upon them saying that ). I then investigated after a second poster said the same, and went to a different browser or signed out (forget which), and then experienced what the poster was telling me, with it not going to the post.

Huh. Do me a favor and tell me where this link takes you.

[Gondwanaland]

Interesting. As a "department head" (mods with our names in green) I don't have anyone on ignore but every time I follow one of her post links it takes me to the top of a page where the post she referenced isn't on. Now my setting is for 30 posts per page but if it's supposed to go to a specific post that shouldn't matter.

Oh, I'm talking about when she just says to go to a numbered post. THe post links definitely have something wrong with them, other forums they work fine and take you directly to the linked post, something with this forum/software/settings screws those links up so they only work for the person who copied them.

I learned that early on here when I did the same and provided a post link and got frustrated when someone told me it wasn't going to the post even though it did when I clicked on it (pretty sure I insulted their intelligence upon them saying that ). I then investigated after a second poster said the same, and went to a different browser or signed out (forget which), and then experienced what the poster was telling me, with it not going to the post.

[rogue06]

Yep. One of the first times H_A did the 'go to post number x' to me, I did, and the post she was talking about wasn't there, so I experimented taking someone off ignore, and voila, a bunch of posts appeared that weren't in the numbering for me, shifting the numbers. She's been told this numerous times and still persists doing it.

Interesting. As a "department head" (mods with our names in green) I don't have anyone on ignore but every time I follow one of her post links it takes me to the top of a page where the post she referenced isn't on. Now my setting is for 30 posts per page but if it's supposed to go to a specific post that shouldn't matter.

[Gondwanaland]

Ah - wasn't aware of that.

Yep. One of the first times H_A did the 'go to post number x' to me, I did, and the post she was talking about wasn't there, so I experimented taking someone off ignore, and voila, a bunch of posts appeared that weren't in the numbering for me, shifting the numbers. She's been told this numerous times and still persists doing it.

[tabibito]

The minute you have someone on ignore, the numbers are useless anyway, I don't understand why this twit can't learn how to quote

Ah - wasn't aware of that.

[Gondwanaland]

At best, the claim that there was no anti-Semitism as we know it in the ancient world has no support. But that was not your original claim anyway. Your original claim was that there was no anti-Semitism in the ancient world. Moreover, your claim that Nazism drew on church anti-Semitism, which had religious aspects, doesn't float if your definitions are accepted. Nazi anti-Semitism had precious little religious basis, but it did reflect already cited attitudes of 1 century pagan writers.

Not to mention the Nazis were also targeting other people like homosexuals, Gypsies, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc., which by her definition that she's used, means that they weren't anti-semitic because there were other groups being discriminated against and harmed as well, outside of just Jews. Which is the argument she's used to claim there wasn't Greco-Roman antisemitism even though anyone with eyes can see it.

[Gondwanaland]

The contention has been that anti-Semitism as we understand and define that term today, existed in the Graeco-Roman world. It didn't.

It did. You simply have made up your own exclusionary definition for 'anti-Semitism as we understand and define it today', in order to blame Christians for anti-semitism, and as a result have basically defined Nazis as not anti-Semitic as well

[Gondwanaland]

Please provide the exact quote from me where I have written that "there was no anti-Semitism in the ancient world".

Search this thread for your posts. That's been your entire argument this entire time.

[Gondwanaland]

Please don't fall into her trap of posting numbers

The quote function is so much better

The minute you have someone on ignore, the numbers are useless anyway, I don't understand why this twit can't learn how to quote

[rogue06]

Tomorrow is Ham & Cheese Omelet day. With about six to seven sausage links (and a sausage patty or two if they're not dry), nine to ten slices of crispy bacon (more if no patties), a biscuit and gravy, some fish, a small blueberry muffin, two glasses of good OJ and a banana.

Wasn't hungry yesterday morning so I went today.

Asked for a three egg omelet rather than two. Seven sausage links, two patties (they're good again), ten strips of bacon, biscuit and gravy, fish, the muffin, 2 glasses of OJ and banana.

Yeah. I'm stuffed.

[rogue06]

Please don't fall into her trap of posting numbers

The quote function is so much better

I don't think it is a trap but rather due to incompetence. Every time she has linked to a post that I've checked out it goes to the top of a page that doesn't include that post.

[CivilDiscourse]

The first comments about anti-Semitism in the ancient world begin around post #340. The first mention of "as we know it" occurs at post #386. With her initial claim seppa'd, H_A changed the parameters to "as we know it."

Please don't fall into her trap of posting numbers

The quote function is so much better

[tabibito]

Have you provided an actual definition of what you mean by "anti-semitism as we know it"?

The first comments about anti-Semitism in the ancient world begin around post #340. The first mention of "as we know it" occurs at post #386. With her initial claim seppa'd, H_A changed the parameters to "as we know it."

[CivilDiscourse]

Please provide the exact quote from me where I have written that "there was no anti-Semitism in the ancient world".

Have you provided an actual definition of what you mean by "anti-semitism as we know it"?