Originally posted by Gondwanaland
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
"I think we should throw those books in a fire"
Collapse
X
-
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View PostNot particularly. That you don't understand how morals develop and think that your deity handed your morals to you, does not make morals developed through reason, biology, and empathy, invalid. Your ignorance does not mean anything.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
Your link doesn't address Craig's argument, because at no point does he argue that atheists can't be moral. Craig's point is that once objective morality is removed from the equation, then nothing can actually be wrong, and things like empathy, and understanding how your actions can harm others are no longer virtues. You're simply doing what society has taught you to do, but what if you decided to rebel against societal norms and carve a new moral path of maximizing your own wealth and pleasure with no regard for others? If morality is subjective, as you insist, then how could that be wrong?
And I find it curious that you would sneer at the laws of God as recorded in the Bible but apparently have no problem with secular laws against murder or theft. If we follow your argument, we may as well strike all laws from the books, because surely we don't need the government telling us it's wrong to arbitrarily kill our neighbor.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View Post
The very creation points to God, your moral sense points to God, your rational abilities points to God.
SO again, If you could prove your God exists, that he revealed such a law to man (I sure hope you're not referring to the jumble of contradictory nonsense in the Bible), and that he is moral himself, then we might be able to go down such a line of reasoning. But you, and every other theist, has failed to do so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View Post
Not ignorance, fact. Your ethical conclusions are no more valid or correct that of the murderous Maoist.
He used reason to further his moral ideals, as you used reason to develop your position. So like I said, reason tells us nothing about what is moral or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View Post
It directly addresses his argument. I never said he argues that atheists can't be moral. Thanks for following that with a direct indication that you did not read the link.
I sneer at the 'laws of God' because they are a jumble of local bronze aged laws created by the society at the time, that people like you revere (but only certain ones - others you discard when they are inconvenient, like when you want to eat bacon, or when you realize that stoning witches and gays would not go over well in the Western world today - we see the opposite of that play out in Africa where such things aren't so looked down on, and Christians do such things) and act as if they are 'moral absolutes', even though they shift wildly throughout the Bible, and your own deity breaks his own laws. That, my dear, is why I 'sneer at the laws of God as recorded in the Bible.
As for your article, I did read it, and it immediately launched into the "you don't need to believe in God to be moral" song and dance which is an argument Craig never made. On the contrary, an atheist can behave in a way that we have come to recognize as moral, but if there is no objective mortality, then there is nothing virtuous about it, just as it is not lacking in virtue to behave in a way that we have come to recognize as immoral. If morality is subjective, then society is nothing more then "a jumble of contemporary laws" that we have no obligation to observe. This is perfectly consistent with atheism, and in fact is the logical conclusion of your worldview, so I'm not sure why you so strongly object.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View PostNor are yours. Especially so, given that your religion has killed more than any murderous Maoist.1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Comment
-
Originally posted by tabibito View Post
Quite an interesting perception, but what makes it Mountain Man's religion?
That would only be a valid observation if Mountain Man subscribed to the same precepts. Or would you consider being yourself classed as one with Maoists a valid criticism? or as one with the Tatars, perhaps?
And no, I would not consider myself classed as one with Maoists because I do not Follow any Maoist precepts.Unlike the Christian who follows Christian precepts
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
I have to wonder how familiar you really are with the Bible
if you think it is nothing more than "a jumble of bronze age laws".
I sometimes get the impression that you stopped reading at Leviticus. And God breaking his own laws? I'm not sure I even want to get into the confusion of ideas that leads you to that conclusion.
As for your article, I did read it, and it immediately launched into the "you don't need to believe in God to be moral" song and dance which is an argument Craig never made. On the contrary, an atheist can behave in a way that we have come to recognize as moral, but if there is no objective mortality, then there is nothing virtuous about it, just as it is not lacking in virtue to behave in a way that we have come to recognize as immoral. If morality is subjective, then society is nothing more then "a jumble of contemporary laws" that we have no obligation to observe. This is perfectly consistent with atheism, and in fact is the logical conclusion of your worldview, so I'm not sure why you so strongly object.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View Post
And if you want to just copypasta, well: https://www.atheistalliance.org/abou...theists-moral/
I note however, one particular point that is relevant to God's so called immoral actions in the Old Testament, viz:
when an action affects many people and results in harm to some and benefits to others, it is difficult to determine its moral value. In other cases, the moral value of an action is difficult to determine because its long-term consequences are hard to predict.Last edited by tabibito; 12-02-2021, 12:33 AM.1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
Unsubstantiated claims like "There is no absolute knowledge.""It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
Those who believe they have absolute knowledge feel themselves free to destroy anything that contravenes their belief, and they invariably do precisely that.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View PostNor are yours. Especially so, given that your religion has killed more than any murderous Maoist.
Like I said, that you are not able to understand it, is your personal defect. I only hope you never lose your faith, since that appears the only thing keeping you somewhat moral.
Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
Those who believe they have absolute knowledge feel themselves free to destroy anything that contravenes their belief, and they invariably do precisely that.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View PostLiterally a semester away from being a pastor, hun.
Or rather, you are blinded by your brainwashing much as the Branch Covidians are by theirs, and cannot see it for what it is. Just repeating and believing what your herdmasters told you.
He regularly breaks his own laws. You simply handwave it away, and pretend it's okay.
So you didn't read it, you just started and then stopped when it said something you didn't like. Gotcha. I've played that game with H_A too many times, not accepting it from you, so, so long.
I also can't help but notice that you have, once again, failed to address my argument and are instead relying on a link to an article to do your arguing for you, an article which doesn't do anything to refute the arguments I have presented. On the contrary, I have already conceded that it is possible for atheists to behave in a manner that could be considered moral. The problem for you, however, is thinking that there is any virtue in doing so when your worldview demands that morality is subjective. What if someone decides that the greatest good is to enrich himself with no regard for the welfare of others? If atheism is true, then you must necessarily accept that as a morally valid way to live, and yet you don't -- for instance, you place great value on empathy -- because contrary to atheism, you instinctively recognize certain behaviors as objectively immoral. You do what every atheist is forced to do: you loudly proclaim that morality is subjective while quietly borrowing Christian ethics to paper over the cracks in your own moral philosophy. And like many atheists, I'm not sure you're even aware that you're doing it.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
- 2 likes
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Today, 01:12 PM
|
4 responses
45 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 02:38 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
|
45 responses
303 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Starlight
Today, 05:05 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
|
60 responses
385 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:09 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
|
0 responses
27 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by rogue06
04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-16-2024, 06:47 AM
|
100 responses
436 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 12:45 PM |
Comment