People who haven't experienced <X> can't force their opinions on others WRT to <X>

[CivilDiscourse]

If you cannot comprehend my answer re abortion [which incidentally was the topic that prompted you to start this thread], then that is your problem. I am not going down your rabbit hole.

I understood your answer with regard to abortion. You just didn't answer my question of whether the logic that underlies your position is general, or if it is just a special carve out just for your pet issue?

[tabibito]

I understood your answer with regard to abortion. You just didn't answer my question of whether the logic that underlies your position is general, or if it is just a special carve out just for your pet issue?

The idea that abortion is a women's issue rather than a societal issue kind of indicates that logic isn't a high priority.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

I understood your answer with regard to abortion. You just didn't answer my question of whether the logic that underlies your position is general, or if it is just a special carve out just for your pet issue?

Then you understood my answer.

[CivilDiscourse]

Then you understood my answer.

You never answered. So, At this point I believe it's safe to conclude that it's merely a carve out for your pet issue.

[rogue06]

As medical science currently stands no biological man is capable of becoming pregnant. To make a jocular reply he does not possess the correct "plumbing".

Biology isn't politically correct amongst the loony left

[rogue06]

The most hilarious thing about today's "woke" society, is that you're actually transphobic by makong the statement the you were quoted making. Because, according to current woke reality, a man can be pregnant and have a baby. So you'd be transphobic if you said that man cannot have a say on abortion and transphobic if you state that he is a woman and not a man.

To her credit H_A has been consistent in her opposition to the trans adulation craze that preoccupies so much of the left these days.

[rogue06]

Sometimes I think you compete with firstfloor for saying stupid things.

I'd bet I have FAR more experience working with pregnant women that you do, as part of our Pregnancy Center.
And I don't have to BE pregnant to see what goes on.

I wonder how many obstetricians and gynecologists are unqualified according to H_A's criteria.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

The idea that abortion is a women's issue rather than a societal issue kind of indicates that logic isn't a high priority.

It is a woman's right to choose what she does with her body. In that regard it is a woman's issue.

[rogue06]

I'll let tab explain what he meant but Greek mothers are said to have told their sons headed off to war to return either carrying their shield or carried on their shield (dead) or not all (shields are heavy and someone retreating or running from battle tend to drop it). Of course, on the other side there's the play Lysistrata. While fictional if there wasn't opposition to war from women it would make no sense.

[Sparko]

When you become pregnant then you can decide on whether or not you wish to terminate your pregnancy.

No. Because the fetus is a separate human being, and not part of the mother's body, so she has no right to decide to kill her offspring. And the fetus didn't magically appear in her uterus, there was a male involved somewhere.

You still keep dragging out this nonsense saying that someone has to experience or participate in a situation in order to comment on it. That pretty much excludes your commentary on 90% of the threads on Theologyweb.

[Sparko]

You will never be pregnant. Fact. Yes you can offer your opinions on the topic of abortion, and I have always acknowledged that it is a complex ethical issue.

However, you [collective] have no right to try and prevent another person from exercising free choice in that matter.

I will never murder someone, so by your reasoning I can never try to prevent another person from exercising their choice to murder someone else.

By the way at your age you will never become pregnant either, so you also cannot comment on abortion.

[Gondwanaland]

No. Because the fetus is a separate human being, and not part of the mother's body, so she has no right to decide to kill her offspring. And the fetus didn't magically appear in her uterus, there was a male involved somewhere.

You still keep dragging out this nonsense saying that someone has to experience or participate in a situation in order to comment on it. That pretty much excludes your commentary on 90% of the threads on Theologyweb.

In addition, on average in the US, males make up around 50 percent of these murdered babies. We have all the right in the world to speak up about it (as does the male whose child that is).

[Cow Poke]

You will never be pregnant. Fact.

WOW, what an ASTOUNDING observation on your part!

Yes you can offer your opinions on the topic of abortion, and I have always acknowledged that it is a complex ethical issue.

However, you [collective] have no right to try and prevent another person from exercising free choice in that matter.

That's about a stupid a statement as you can ever make -- I have EVERY right to try to prevent another person from doing something I believe is wrong. Try and stop me.

[Cow Poke]

It is a woman's right to choose what she does with her body. In that regard it is a woman's issue.

You can pretend that all you want, but you can't stop us from being involved.

[Cow Poke]

It is a woman's right to choose what she does with her body. In that regard it is a woman's issue.

Only in your mind, and the minds of other loony leftists.

And if men have no right saying anything about it, those MEN on the Supreme Court should have just shut up, yes?