Great to hear. It's incredible that this even still existed, but until this case, any atheist (and pretty much anyone who didn't believe in the Christian God, depending on how one looks at it) was required to swear an oath to 'God' in order to vote, and could technically be held guilty of perjury if they swore the oath and did so 'falsely' (which would apply to anyone that doesn't believe in said deity, if someone wanted to make a case of it).
One atheist went to register to vote last year, and objected to the oath. He was told either sign it or don't vote, and wasn't allowed to cross out the portion of the vote requiring swearing to God. The FFRF filed a federal suit on his behalf, and Alabama, as a result, has since quickly changed it to allow a checkbox option for those who decline to swear to God.
The oath to God is still there, which is absurd, but at least atheists and people of otehr faiths no longer have to technically break the law in order to vote.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...te-in-alabama/
One atheist went to register to vote last year, and objected to the oath. He was told either sign it or don't vote, and wasn't allowed to cross out the portion of the vote requiring swearing to God. The FFRF filed a federal suit on his behalf, and Alabama, as a result, has since quickly changed it to allow a checkbox option for those who decline to swear to God.
The oath to God is still there, which is absurd, but at least atheists and people of otehr faiths no longer have to technically break the law in order to vote.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/...te-in-alabama/
After filing a lawsuit, atheist in Alabama have successfully eliminated a religious test for voting.
Here's the backstory: Until recently, if you wanted to register to vote in Alabama, you had to read and sign a declaration that included a religious reference:
AlabamaOathVoter.png
Some people may just ignore that, but let's be clear: That's a religious reference that has no business on any kind of voter registration form, much less in a declaration every person needs to sign in order to gain a right they already have.
It's not just innocuous either. If you sign that statement without actually agreeing with what it says, it's perjury. That form even says that anyone who "falsely" signs the statement could be "convicted and imprisoned for up to five years." That means Alabama atheists who don't want to swear an oath to God are technically committing a crime by doing what they must in order to vote. Whether or not they would be prosecuted for it is besides the point.
Last November, atheist Randal Cragun wanted to register to vote. But he couldn't honestly sign that declaration. So he contacted the office of the Secretary of State and asked for advice. They told him he had no alternatives: Sign the form or don't vote. He was also told, "If you cross out a portion [of the oath], the board of registrars in your county will reject the application and ask you to re-submit."
"The Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to state officials on Cragun's behalf, but they were told the same thing. There was no remedy. Unless lawmakers passed a bill to change the oath - good luck with that - nothing would change.
So on behalf of Cragun and three other atheists in similar situations, FFRF filed a federal lawsuit against the state in October. They said in the complaint:
All of this could be remedied, they said, if Alabama either gave atheists the exact same form without the religious wording or removed the unnecessary words from the oath altogether.
Alabama fixed it a different way. The new version of the voter registration form includes a box that anyone can check off if they have a "sincerely held belief" that prevents them from agreeing to the words "so help me God."
GodAlabamaOathFix.png
An emergency motion to allow that option went into effect shortly after the last election, but now the checkbox will be on all future forms. It's not as good as changing the oath itself, but it at least fixes the legal problems.
FFRF has voluntarily dismissed its own lawsuit as a result.
It's the right result for a battle we shouldn't have ahad to fight at all. It's absurd that atheists have to do all this work in order to get the state of Alabama to do the bare minimum. But even in a state that elects Christian Nationalists across the board, officials there have an obligation to keep the government secular.
Here's the backstory: Until recently, if you wanted to register to vote in Alabama, you had to read and sign a declaration that included a religious reference:
AlabamaOathVoter.png
Some people may just ignore that, but let's be clear: That's a religious reference that has no business on any kind of voter registration form, much less in a declaration every person needs to sign in order to gain a right they already have.
It's not just innocuous either. If you sign that statement without actually agreeing with what it says, it's perjury. That form even says that anyone who "falsely" signs the statement could be "convicted and imprisoned for up to five years." That means Alabama atheists who don't want to swear an oath to God are technically committing a crime by doing what they must in order to vote. Whether or not they would be prosecuted for it is besides the point.
Last November, atheist Randal Cragun wanted to register to vote. But he couldn't honestly sign that declaration. So he contacted the office of the Secretary of State and asked for advice. They told him he had no alternatives: Sign the form or don't vote. He was also told, "If you cross out a portion [of the oath], the board of registrars in your county will reject the application and ask you to re-submit."
"The Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to state officials on Cragun's behalf, but they were told the same thing. There was no remedy. Unless lawmakers passed a bill to change the oath - good luck with that - nothing would change.
So on behalf of Cragun and three other atheists in similar situations, FFRF filed a federal lawsuit against the state in October. They said in the complaint:
The Secretary of State and the State of Alabama are coercing a statement of belief in a monotheistic deity by requiring nontheists to swear "so help me God" in order to register to vote.
...
...48 states in the United States do not require voters to swear "so help me God" in order to register to vote. The lone exception, North Dakota, does not require voters to register at all. Alabama is the only state that has voter registration forms that violate the rights of conscience of voters who are nontheists.
...
...48 states in the United States do not require voters to swear "so help me God" in order to register to vote. The lone exception, North Dakota, does not require voters to register at all. Alabama is the only state that has voter registration forms that violate the rights of conscience of voters who are nontheists.
Alabama fixed it a different way. The new version of the voter registration form includes a box that anyone can check off if they have a "sincerely held belief" that prevents them from agreeing to the words "so help me God."
GodAlabamaOathFix.png
An emergency motion to allow that option went into effect shortly after the last election, but now the checkbox will be on all future forms. It's not as good as changing the oath itself, but it at least fixes the legal problems.
FFRF has voluntarily dismissed its own lawsuit as a result.
FFRF's plaintiffs Chris Nelson and Heather Coleman (who are married) were able to register using the new form in March. Both of their registrations were accepted by the Shelby County Registrars. "We are glad that the state has - at least, begrudgingly - made some concessions to support state-church seperation, and that freethinkers in Alabama will continue to push for these reforms," they say.
The other plaintiffs have expressed their appreciation for not being forced to pose as religious in order to exercise such a basic right.
"Because of this suit I will finally be able to register to vote in Alabama," says Cragun. "It is disappointing that the state prevented me from voting in the 2020 elections, but I am looking forward to participating in the future, and I now have a better appreciation of the value my voice and other individual voices contribute to shaping the state."
Adds co-plaintiff Robert Corker, "I am proud to have been a part of this effort to secularize voting in the state of Alabama. I relish more opportunities to foster inclusiveness for nonbelievers in this state."
...
"The secretary of state was consciously discriminating against nonbelieving voters," says FFRF Senior Litigation Counsel Patrick Elliott. "We obtained our goal of ensuring equal voting rights."
The other plaintiffs have expressed their appreciation for not being forced to pose as religious in order to exercise such a basic right.
"Because of this suit I will finally be able to register to vote in Alabama," says Cragun. "It is disappointing that the state prevented me from voting in the 2020 elections, but I am looking forward to participating in the future, and I now have a better appreciation of the value my voice and other individual voices contribute to shaping the state."
Adds co-plaintiff Robert Corker, "I am proud to have been a part of this effort to secularize voting in the state of Alabama. I relish more opportunities to foster inclusiveness for nonbelievers in this state."
...
"The secretary of state was consciously discriminating against nonbelieving voters," says FFRF Senior Litigation Counsel Patrick Elliott. "We obtained our goal of ensuring equal voting rights."
Comment