Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
"Liberal" can describe an enormous amount of different viewpoints and considering that there's no practical way of banning guns period I don't think that's a rational fear. There are so many factors at play with relying on citizens or even police to stop a mass shooter that it shouldn't be relied upon outside of a desperate last resort. Gun free zones are the very least of our problems in spree shooting prevention.
Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
Who's going to report it? The person who STOLE it?
Or you think that the owner reporting "somebody stole my gun" makes it somehow magically disappear or end up in the possession of the police?
How are they going to catch him? How do they know the gun he has hidden in his backpack is stolen?
Is somebody "more dead" if killed by a stolen gun than a legal one?
Seriously, you, like other anti-gun liberals, don't live in reality.
Are you aware that, as of 2020, there were 393 MILLION guns in the US?
You REALLY believe that somebody who intends to do mass carnage can't get their hands on guns?
Perhaps you're unaware that it takes only 2-4 seconds to "swap magazines" when you're firing a semi-automatic weapon.
Liberals come at this with banning "assault rifles" (mass shooters prefer handguns) or "high capacity magazines" (most active shooters used multiple standard magazines of 10-15 rounds each.
Seriously, when a liberal looks at "gun control", they come at it from a total FANTASY world where they think they can simply make rules and everybody cooperates.
That's not how it works. That's not how ANY of this works.
Or you think that the owner reporting "somebody stole my gun" makes it somehow magically disappear or end up in the possession of the police?
How are they going to catch him? How do they know the gun he has hidden in his backpack is stolen?
Is somebody "more dead" if killed by a stolen gun than a legal one?
Seriously, you, like other anti-gun liberals, don't live in reality.
Are you aware that, as of 2020, there were 393 MILLION guns in the US?
You REALLY believe that somebody who intends to do mass carnage can't get their hands on guns?
Perhaps you're unaware that it takes only 2-4 seconds to "swap magazines" when you're firing a semi-automatic weapon.
Liberals come at this with banning "assault rifles" (mass shooters prefer handguns) or "high capacity magazines" (most active shooters used multiple standard magazines of 10-15 rounds each.
Seriously, when a liberal looks at "gun control", they come at it from a total FANTASY world where they think they can simply make rules and everybody cooperates.
That's not how it works. That's not how ANY of this works.
BTW, I have not once proposed or advocated for any particular gun control policy in this conversation, so I don't know what rules you think I'm making but they exist only in your head.
Comment