Plot Thickens: Whistleblower Reveals Pfizer Hid Aborted Fetus Cell Testing In Vaccine

[Gondwanaland]

A whistleblower from a Pfizer branch in Kansas has come forward with a number of emails from corporate and high ranked executives wherein they tried to hide/mask the use of aborted fetal cell lines in their MRNA vaccines/testing, from the public.

[mossrose]

Gond, thanks for posting these.

I will have to watch this later, but the other video from a day or two ago had profanity in it. If there is profanity in this one, could you just post the link to the video instead of the video?

Thank you!

If you need us to edit it for you just let one of us know.

[Gondwanaland]

Gond, thanks for posting these.

I will have to watch this later, but the other video from a day or two ago had profanity in it. If there is profanity in this one, could you just post the link to the video instead of the video?

Thank you!

If you need us to edit it for you just let one of us know.

Mmm, not sure. I don't particularly pay attention to or register 'profanity' (especially as that can mean different things to different people) when I'm watching videos. But here's the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUXGB5FzhPc

[NorrinRadd]

For some time there's been a belief among some that the "aborted fetal tissue" thing applied to all of the Chicom Bug vaxes, so even before this revelation, my best friend's son was planning to use the issue to seek a religious exemption from the jab. (He objects to the jab for various reasons, but that one is the only one likely to qualify for a religious exemption.) He's a civilian working on a military base, so if he doesn't get the exemption, he expects to lose his job on Nov. 22.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

A whistleblower from a Pfizer branch in Kansas has come forward with a number of emails from corporate and high ranked executives wherein they tried to hide/mask the use of aborted fetal cell lines in their MRNA vaccines/testing, from the public.

Question. Prior to undergoing any form of treatment did you ask for a full breakdown of how and where all the drug therapies used in your chemo were developed and tested?

Or did you not accept any conventional medicine?

[Gondwanaland]

Question. Prior to undergoing any form of treatment did you ask for a full breakdown of how and where all the drug therapies used in your chemo were developed and tested?

yes, or do the research myself. Anyone with a brain should. But then chemo was to actually try to save my life. Not to provide weak protection against something with a 99.9 percent survival rate.

Or did you not accept any conventional medicine?

I don't take flu vaccines that were developed using eggs, for example, as a vegan.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

yes, or do the research myself.

Prior to agreeing to undergo any chemo did you research every single one of the drug therapies that were probably going to be used on you? Did your oncologist give you a list in advance?

Or at that juncture did you trust the medical science because you perceived your life to be potentially threatened?.

I don't take flu vaccines that were developed using eggs, for example, as a vegan.

That is something I have noted from other vegans.

[Gondwanaland]

Prior to agreeing to undergo any chemo did you research every single one of the drug therapies that were probably going to be used on you? Did your oncologist give you a list in advance?

Or at that juncture did you trust the medical science because you perceived your life to be potentially threatened?.

What kind of weirdo would not research what the doctor says they are going to give you? Or all potential treatments for what you've been diagnosed? Like????

That is something I have noted from other vegans.

Huh?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

What kind of weirdo would not research what the doctor says they are going to give you? Or all potential treatments for what you've been diagnosed? Like????

That depends on the condition and the situation.

An individual suffering from a life-threatening condition or experience is hardly in a position to say to the medical team "Just a moment, before you do anything to assist me and potentially save my life, can you tell me precisely what drugs you are going to be administering to me and how and where those drugs were tested?"

[Gondwanaland]

That depends on the condition and the situation.

An individual suffering from a life-threatening condition or experience is hardly in a position to say to the medical team "Just a moment, before you do anything to assist me and potentially save my life, can you tell me precisely what drugs you are going to be administering to me and how and where those drugs were tested?"

Unless I'm laying on an operating table unable to speak or something, I don't see any reason not to know what treatment is being used and what it involves, etc.. You just, what, do whatever the doctor tells you without independent thought? Having seen firsthand how prevalent malpractice can be in the profession, that's a no from me dawg.

In any case, that's all quite a different thing than an injection that provides possible marginal protection from a virus that has a 99.9 percent survival rate. Especially when I've already had said virus.

[Gondwanaland]

Unless I'm laying on an operating table unable to speak or something, I don't see any reason not to know what treatment is being used and what it involves, etc.. You just, what, do whatever the doctor tells you without independent thought? Having seen firsthand how prevalent malpractice can be in the profession, that's a no from me dawg.

In any case, that's all quite a different thing than an injection that provides possible marginal protection from a virus that has a 99.9 percent survival rate. Especially when I've already had said virus.

Let me share with you a story that really opened my eyes, beyond my knowledge of just malpractice in the profession. My son, back in the early 90s, was in 6th grade. This was back when recess was still a thing and kids played outside regularly. He hurt his foot. Twisted his ankle pretty good. They iced it, and he seemed to get better over the next week or so. But he favored that foot. He started turning it inward so the arch was up and he put most of his weight on the outer edge of the foot. And he kept doing that. Didn't realize it himself, and most of the day he'd have socks or shoes on and we didn't notice until it got more and more pronounced over the next few months. We tried to remind him every time he walked to turn his foot back the way it should be, and there was a little improvement but not much.

So we took him to his pediatrician. They sent us to a foot specialist. That foot specialist sent us to another foot specialist. Both of the foot specialists decided his muscles were too tight and pulling his foot that way, and that the obvious solution was to use botox injections to loosen the muscles. So we thought, okay, fair enough, that's two different doctors with the same opinion. So we go in a week later to a doctor that specializes in use of botox. The doctor takes a look, the botox already in the room. And she asks us, have we seen any sort of improvement at all, even just a little. We say yeah, there has been a little, but the doctors said to go do this otherwise he'll probably walk like this the rest of his life. So she places the botox back into the container, tells us that if it was her kid, she would take him to physical therapy for a few months, and then if there still was no change, she'd try something as drastic as botox. She did not seem very happy with the foot doctors that had sent us to her. She set us up with a great physical therapist, and within a single month of hard work in and out of sessions, my son was back to walking normal again.

Not only should you question and investigate (especially if you have potential moral issues with certain things!), but sometimes even a second opinion isn't enough. Sometimes a third, fourth, etc., opinion is needed. Doctors aren't perfect arbiters of medical knowledge.

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Unless I'm laying on an operating table unable to speak or something, I don't see any reason not to know what treatment is being used and what it involves, etc..

Precisely my point.

You just, what, do whatever the doctor tells you without independent thought? Having seen firsthand how prevalent malpractice can be in the profession, that's a no from me dawg.

Thank you for your assumption at which you have arrived without any actual evidence.

In any case, that's all quite a different thing than an injection that provides possible marginal protection from a virus that has a 99.9 percent survival rate. Especially when I've already had said virus.

Thank you for not actually answering my question re your chemo.

Did the oncologists give you a list of the protocols to be used? Did you ascertain exactly where and how each drug in each of those protocols was produced and tested?

[Gondwanaland]

Precisely my point.

Your point was.... what? That if I'm physically unable to speak and question my doctors, that I would have to accept whatever treatment they gave because I literally cannot question or make a choice? Wow, what a brilliant deduction.

Thank you for your assumption at which you have arrived without any actual evidence.

That was a question. See that little squiggly shephard's crook mark above a dot? That's a question mark. It denotes that I am asking a question of you.

Thank you for not actually answering my question re your chemo.

I.... literally answered it. Several posts before. WHich part of "yes, or do the research myself. Anyone with a brain should." did your noggin not compute?

Did the oncologists give you a list of the protocols to be used? Did you ascertain exactly where and how each drug in each of those protocols was produced and tested?

Yes, they did. I sought out numerous oncologists for a second, third, and fourth opinion, and got a variety of prognoses and treatment plans, And yes, I did my research on the drugs. What sort of weirdo would not?

[Hypatia_Alexandria]

Your point was.... what? That if I'm physically unable to speak and question my doctors,

My point was that only on occasions are patients able to enquire, research, etc.

that I would have to accept whatever treatment they gave because I literally cannot question or make a choice?

If you were not in a state to do so, yes.

That was a question.

It read as rhetorical.

.

I.... literally answered it. Several posts before. WHich part of "yes, or do the research myself. Anyone with a brain should." did your noggin not compute?

So prior to your accepting any form of chemo you allege that you had ascertained detailed information on the following:

• exactly where the drugs that were going to be used in your treatment were made
• the active constituent[s] in each drug
• from whence those constituents had been obtained
• how those constituents had been obtained
• how those drugs were tested
• on whom were they tested
• the results of trials of those tests
• what possible long term effects all those drugs might have

.

[CivilDiscourse]

My point was that only on occasions are patients able to enquire, research, etc.

I sincerely doubt your honesty here. Your question "read" as a gotcha, where you were trying to call him out on hypocrisy after all, why ask him about HIS Chemo if you were trying to make a general point about patients being "unable". Do you think he was unable to research his chemo drugs?

It read as rhetorical.

That's your own basic inability to read for comprehension popping up again.