Is ‘financial abortion’ an idea whose time has come?

[CivilDiscourse]

Ah, I haven't read that far, my bad. When she starts it I'll take both my posts over there.

I wouldn't hold your breath. This seemed like a deliberate provocation for derail. Her response after being asked to make her own thread on "men can't be raped if they have an erection" was this:

I would suspect that male rape victims have to first be identified as having been raped - a point to which my comments had relevance.

As for male anatomy and sexual behaviour - that is not my area of expertise.

[CivilDiscourse]

Can a woman actually "rape" a man? A sixteen year old having sex with a twelve year old is illegal in our societies but was the twelve year old boy forced against his consent? He presumably had an erection - otherwise I am thinking the mechanics would have been quite awkward and entailed a lot of fumbling. He presumably also released some sperm, either as drips or a full ejaculation, otherwise she could not have become pregant.

He was certainly seduced by a slightly older girl but I am not sure if one could call it rape. The term statutory rape is a legal definition but I also understand that different US states have local laws pertaining to this offence.

However, the payment of child maintenance for young men in that situation is obviously very difficult.

Even under your own suggestions, as a minor aged twelve, he could not have exercised his prerogative to refuse any financial commitment given that he was not of legal age to engage in sexual intercourse.

I started an entire thread for you to go down this path.

[CivilDiscourse]

last i checked, abortion was legal.

Lets go ahead and start that discussion about the man's responsibility, shall we?

kccd?

[Mountain Man]

kccd?

Looks like pro-abortion women really don't want to have this discussion.

[CivilDiscourse]

Looks like pro-abortion women really don't want to have this discussion.

I'm not surprised, most often the responses are either deferment until abortion is perfect, or arguments, that if used against abortion, would be deemed sexist and controlling.