Originally posted by CivilDiscourse
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
The Blue Wall of Silence Is Starting to Crack
Collapse
X
-
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View Post
I think we are both agreed that corruption cannot ever be entirely ruled out. However, merely giving power from one side to the other with no independent oversight is not the best option, in my opinion.
This is your problem, you have assumed from the start that what Cow Poke said, was his "one and only" solution to Police Corruption. He never claimed anything like that. He was merely talking about one way to HELP stop corruption, by removing organizations that exist only to protect police officer's jobs at any cost. Unions will protect both good and bad officers. They are a factor in why corruption continues in many departments. Not the only factor, nor would eliminating them eliminate all corruption.
Just like body cams and independent oversight will not eliminate police corruption.
In fact, I do know what will eliminate ALL POLICE CORRUPTION.
All we have to do is eliminate the Police! Then there will be no more police corruption.
Problem solved. Then we just need to find a way to stop crime without a police force.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
Where did Cow Poke say not to have any independent oversight?
"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostHe has never referred to any independent oversight in his replies to me.Last edited by QuantaFille; 04-30-2021, 03:18 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostHe has never referred to any independent oversight in his replies to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostHe has never referred to any independent oversight in his replies to me.
Does that do it?
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CivilDiscourse View PostHypatia has never once mentioned that she does not condone ----------------------. So we must assume that she favors it.
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
so? He never said that was the end-all solution to corruption. There are probably lots of things he didn't mention to you. An argument from silence is a logical fallacy, you know.
We need every cop to wear a body camera. We need to curb the power of police unions, the biggest protectors of the blue wall. And we need officers of all stripes to back the words of those 14 in Minneapolis. They said, “This is not who we are.” Now prove it.
In such an article, it is very common to "save the best for last".
The author clearly stated that the police unions were "the biggest protectors of the blue wall", and that's where the remedial action should be focused.
There are other things that can be done to mitigate the problem -- but this is where, in my opinion, and the opinion of the author -- we should start.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
I wish somebody had independent oversight over that ditzy old biddy from Germany to stop her from being such a pedantic gripey old .
Does that do it?Last edited by CivilDiscourse; 04-30-2021, 01:14 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
so? He never said that was the end-all solution to corruption. There are probably lots of things he didn't mention to you. An argument from silence is a logical fallacy, you know.
"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
You really are dense. It is RESTORING the rightful power to the police administration, mayor and city council, and reining in the abusive power of the police unions, or eliminating them entirely.
Nobody claimed that "transferring power from A to B will eliminate the risk of corruption". That's simply your own dishonest derail.
You need to remember that others are permitted to disagree with, and challenge, you.
My observation simply highlighted a potential flaw , which premised on your replies, you had not addressed.
"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
Ignoring your obligatory flatulence....
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostBecause he/she is hired/commissioned for that post.
Are these two links incorrect? If so, in what way[s]?
https://www.govtjobs.com/government-...b-description/
I note that this link pertains to a specific state:
https://www.civilservicesuccess.com/...-police-chief/Last edited by Hypatia_Alexandria; 05-01-2021, 04:43 AM."It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostThat appears to be a grudging acknowledgement that you employed the incorrect word re "usurped"
What precise "powers" have been ceded by Police Chiefs to the various Police Unions in the past twenty years?The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hypatia_Alexandria View PostWhy is pointing out that your comments needed some clarification a "derail"? Or is it Also Sprach Cow Poke?.
You need to remember that others are permitted to disagree with, and challenge, you.
My observation simply highlighted a potential flaw , which premised on your replies, you had not addressed.
The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
Baseless whining noted.
- 1 like
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Yesterday, 02:09 PM
|
5 responses
64 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 05:27 AM
|
||
Started by seanD, Yesterday, 01:25 PM
|
0 responses
12 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Yesterday, 01:25 PM
|
||
Started by VonTastrophe, Yesterday, 08:53 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by oxmixmudd
Yesterday, 10:08 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 04-18-2024, 01:12 PM
|
28 responses
214 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by oxmixmudd
Yesterday, 11:00 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 04-17-2024, 09:33 AM
|
65 responses
484 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Yesterday, 10:40 AM
|
Comment