Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Republicans are up to more election fraud in Florida.
Collapse
X
-
Republicans are up to more election fraud in Florida.
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.Tags: None
-
Republican. One of them.That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. Donaldson
- 1 like
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
The name Katherine Harris comes to mind and an alleged four million dollars that was paid to a company called Database Technologies to search through voter registration lists and remove the name of anyone who might be suspected of having a criminal record.
"It ain't necessarily so
The things that you're liable
To read in the Bible
It ain't necessarily so."
Sportin' Life
Porgy & Bess, DuBose Heyward, George & Ira Gershwin
Comment
-
Wait, I thought that refusing to unquestioningly accept election results was treason, insurrection, an assault on our democracy! Surely Democrats aren't being hypocritical?Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by kccd View Post
What was not specifically mentioned in your quote was that the shadow candidate was not a politician or anyone interested in public office. He was paid to put his name on the ballot because his last name is Rodriguez, the same name as the Dem candidate. The shadow candidate got enough votes to defeat the actual Dem.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
So, see if I got this straight ---- two candidates - same last name - one has an R beside his/her name, and the one with the R won? Do I have that right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Watermelon View Post
It says the winners last name is Garcia. I think it means that someone with the same last name was paid to enter the race as a third candidate to hopefully get some D voters to mistakenly vote for him.P1) If , then I win.
P2)
C) I win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diogenes View Post
Ballots in the US tend to have party identifiers to assist in voting by party as opposed to the actual candidate.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
- 1 like
Comment
-
In other news, House Democrats in Washington are contemplating ignoring Iowa state laws in order to overturn a Republican victory.
House Democrats are attempting to steal a congressional seat to add a member to Speaker Pelosi’s historically-slim majority in the lower chamber. With a blessing from leadership, the House Administration Committee is entertaining a grievance from Iowa Democrat Rita Hart, who lost to Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) in November, on unproven claims of vote count errors.
Miller-Meeks’ victory was confirmed by two recounts and a certification by Iowa election officials. Hart and her representation are struggling to prove any improprieties to the committee, but argue that the House should “depart” from Iowa state laws in order to overturn the election results.
“Indeed, ‘there are instances where it is in fact bound by justice and equity to deviate from it,’ id. at 23—particularly when voter intent can be determined but a ballot is not, for one reason or another, in strict conformity with state law. Where necessary to effectuate the will of the voters of the Second Congressional District, the Committee should therefore exercise its discretion to depart from Iowa law, and adopt counting rules that “disenfranchise the smallest possible number of voters,” a recent appeal filing reads.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/reagan...a-dem-n2586719Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View PostIn other news, House Democrats in Washington are contemplating ignoring Iowa state laws in order to overturn a Republican victory.
House Democrats are attempting to steal a congressional seat to add a member to Speaker Pelosi’s historically-slim majority in the lower chamber. With a blessing from leadership, the House Administration Committee is entertaining a grievance from Iowa Democrat Rita Hart, who lost to Congresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-IA) in November, on unproven claims of vote count errors.
Miller-Meeks’ victory was confirmed by two recounts and a certification by Iowa election officials. Hart and her representation are struggling to prove any improprieties to the committee, but argue that the House should “depart” from Iowa state laws in order to overturn the election results.
“Indeed, ‘there are instances where it is in fact bound by justice and equity to deviate from it,’ id. at 23—particularly when voter intent can be determined but a ballot is not, for one reason or another, in strict conformity with state law. Where necessary to effectuate the will of the voters of the Second Congressional District, the Committee should therefore exercise its discretion to depart from Iowa law, and adopt counting rules that “disenfranchise the smallest possible number of voters,” a recent appeal filing reads.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/reagan...a-dem-n2586719
Hypocrisy on steroids.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
And honestly, if a voter doesn't take the care to ensure they're voting correctly, that's on them. Personally, I always triple check my ballot before submitting it.Last edited by Diogenes; 03-23-2021, 11:51 AM.P1) If , then I win.
P2)
C) I win.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bill the Cat View PostRepublican. One of them.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
Election Fraud is a myth. Why can't Democrats accept the outcome of a free election? This is obviously an insurrection and a coup attempt by the Democrats. We need to bring in the National Guard.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
|
0 responses
27 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by KingsGambit
Yesterday, 04:11 PM
|
||
Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
|
1 response
26 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Yesterday, 10:46 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:08 AM
|
6 responses
58 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by RumTumTugger
Yesterday, 10:30 AM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 07:44 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 07:44 AM | ||
Started by seer, Yesterday, 07:04 AM
|
29 responses
191 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by oxmixmudd
Yesterday, 02:59 PM
|
Comment