Originally posted by Cow Poke
View Post
There is SO much wrong in what you posted that I don't have time to deal with all of it tonight, so I'll just pick this one for now...
That's not how it works -- there were supposedly anonymous sources that said he was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, absent any evidence, testimony, eye witness account, or even any statement from him. He managed to text that he had been bear-sprayed --- you'd think if he'd been clobbered by a fire extinguisher, he would have mentioned that.
As a matter of fact, the "bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher" has been totally abandoned by all but the House Managers still citing it as part of their prosecution, even though it was absolutely blatantly false.
It was absolutely shoddy 'journalism' that had to be walked back by those who published it - that's how much it stunk.
People do not receive the high honor of lying in state in the Capitol Rotunda because they had a stroke.
IF????? No blunt force trauma - no evidence of any impact - no evidence of any bodily damage other than, perhaps, bear spray irritation, which is, admittedly, no picnic.
Again - you totally don't get the concept of such high honors --- they are NEVER doled out based on rumor or speculation.
Of course you are! No proof whatsoever, based only on rumor that was retracted, but your obsession with OMB causes you to want so badly to believe this you care about the facts.
And, besides OMB, on what basis would you "give it the benefit of the doubt"?
As were MANY other people, some of whom were wounded worse than he was. This is a kick in the teeth to them.
They were doing the job they get paid to do.
"That entire day"? How long did the riot last, Jim? See what you're doing? You are grossly exaggerating everything in order to TRY to make a case that simply does not exist.
Wow --- so, assuming his stroke (which we know was caused by a blood clot) was aggravated by (and that's REALLY stretching it) his action at the Capitol that day - that's cause for him to be recognized above ALL OTHERS who defended the Capitol that day?
Jim - seriously, you accuse others of irrational thought - -- that's about as irrational as you can get!
Might as well, have, you blasted them for half the year!
So, here you go, again ---- in the case of Sicknick, you make every allowance possible, no matter how irrational, and make him a hero, where you villainized the federal officers who were protecting, among other things, federal property. And "Secretive"? You're still going with THAT?!?!? What "secret police" actually wear their unit patches on their shoulders?
All you're doing is proving my claim ---
A) you go through all kinds of hoops and hurdles STILL trying to make Sicknick a hero, when that has been exposed as a sham foisted by the Democrats for political purposes.
2) you go through all kinds of hoops and hurdles trying to defend all of your attacks on OTHER federal officers because OMB.
That's not how it works -- there were supposedly anonymous sources that said he was bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, absent any evidence, testimony, eye witness account, or even any statement from him. He managed to text that he had been bear-sprayed --- you'd think if he'd been clobbered by a fire extinguisher, he would have mentioned that.
As a matter of fact, the "bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher" has been totally abandoned by all but the House Managers still citing it as part of their prosecution, even though it was absolutely blatantly false.
It was absolutely shoddy 'journalism' that had to be walked back by those who published it - that's how much it stunk.
People do not receive the high honor of lying in state in the Capitol Rotunda because they had a stroke.
IF????? No blunt force trauma - no evidence of any impact - no evidence of any bodily damage other than, perhaps, bear spray irritation, which is, admittedly, no picnic.
Again - you totally don't get the concept of such high honors --- they are NEVER doled out based on rumor or speculation.
Of course you are! No proof whatsoever, based only on rumor that was retracted, but your obsession with OMB causes you to want so badly to believe this you care about the facts.
And, besides OMB, on what basis would you "give it the benefit of the doubt"?
As were MANY other people, some of whom were wounded worse than he was. This is a kick in the teeth to them.
They were doing the job they get paid to do.
"That entire day"? How long did the riot last, Jim? See what you're doing? You are grossly exaggerating everything in order to TRY to make a case that simply does not exist.
Wow --- so, assuming his stroke (which we know was caused by a blood clot) was aggravated by (and that's REALLY stretching it) his action at the Capitol that day - that's cause for him to be recognized above ALL OTHERS who defended the Capitol that day?
Jim - seriously, you accuse others of irrational thought - -- that's about as irrational as you can get!
Might as well, have, you blasted them for half the year!
So, here you go, again ---- in the case of Sicknick, you make every allowance possible, no matter how irrational, and make him a hero, where you villainized the federal officers who were protecting, among other things, federal property. And "Secretive"? You're still going with THAT?!?!? What "secret police" actually wear their unit patches on their shoulders?
All you're doing is proving my claim ---
A) you go through all kinds of hoops and hurdles STILL trying to make Sicknick a hero, when that has been exposed as a sham foisted by the Democrats for political purposes.
2) you go through all kinds of hoops and hurdles trying to defend all of your attacks on OTHER federal officers because OMB.
I'm going to give you some time to calm down before I post any more replies to you in this thread.
Comment