Originally posted by Ronson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
ARMED protest are planned in all 50 state capitals and DC
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
No the answer to my question is NOT in the link - WHERE did you see this. You just say you saw it in the link you gave. WHERE/WHEN.
Again - it sounds like the same stuff giulianni et al claimed happened in Ga that Ga just put up a website with full access to all the videos showing nothing like what was described actually happened as described.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
It's in the link. I keep listing the same things that I witnessed over and over and over here. It's exhausting. I trust my eyes. I know what I saw.
Again - it sounds like the same stuff giulianni et al claimed happened in Ga that Ga just put up a website with full access to all the videos showing nothing like what was described actually happened as described.Last edited by oxmixmudd; 01-13-2021, 05:53 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
Oh good grief. Where? Are you talking about the fully debunked Trump lawyer team vidoes, or something you saw when physically present observing voting operations in your state?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
No - I'm talking specifically about the recounts in Ga and the evidence presented in the EC debates for PA and Arizona.
'Saw them with my own eyes' - somehow I doubt that but feel free to make your case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
What would you have said if in 1963 if Alabama judges said there were no civil rights violations in their state? Would it be similar to what you're saying now, that we should just trust the judges in states where irregularities occurred?
That's like saying "Every person we asked if they were corrupt said they weren't. Therefore there is a lot of very solid evidence that the election processes in these states where absolutely ethical and above board."
There were astounding irregularities. I saw them with my own eyes.
'Saw them with my own eyes' - somehow I doubt that but feel free to make your case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostAnd if the judges for a state don't believe there is enough evidence to proceed, then there is no reason to proceed. Who else is going to decide that Ronson. Some crazy lady sitting next to Giuliani saying such morbidly inane things even he has to try to get her to be quiet? At some point one has to trust that at least some of those judges the trump lawyers paraded their cases before are honest people of integrity. And they lost them all. There just isn't enough evidence to make the case, and that is just the simple truth.
But it is actually a good bit more than just a lack of evidence Ronson. There is a lot of very solid evidence that the election processes in these states where absolutely ethical, above board, and thorough in all the ways that define a fair and legal election.
There were astounding irregularities. I saw them with my own eyes.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
I see. The transcripts say "laughed out loud."
I think there is sufficient evidence for new elections in contested states.
Because I don't answer loaded questions.
The judges believed there wasn't enough evidence to proceed.
But it is actually a good bit more than just a lack of evidence Ronson. There is a lot of very solid evidence that the election processes in these states where absolutely ethical, above board, and thorough in all the ways that define a fair and legal election. And that sits in stark contrast to the massive lack of evidence for fraud. For our republic to survive, at some point reason has to kick in and win out over emotion and partisan paranoia.
You aren't reading well today.Last edited by oxmixmudd; 01-13-2021, 03:51 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View Post
According to transcripts of the proceedings.
But there is no reason to do that. There is no evidence of fraud sufficient to warrant it. You already admitted that.
I suppose I could, but why would I need to do that?
You already admitted there was not sufficient evidence of fraud to change the result. So the question was based on that admission and is not therefore loaded.
Eg if someone says:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Zara View Post
That's pretty much what I thought when I saw your supposed point. You didn't actually have one, which I guess you know, like Trump knowing full well that there was never systemic fraud (or he is actually delusional) and it was just a fabrication to steal the election, so I decided to treat you like the piece of garbage I know you are.
However, you can prove me wrong:
What was my point, in full context, and how is it even remotely comparable to whatever you said, in full context.
You won't be able to do it, because, you're a retard. So, thanks for playing. Have a • Edited by a Moderator • life.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View Post
*Yawn* Come up with better comebacks if you can't address people's points, bud, that was just embarrassing.
However, you can prove me wrong:
What was my point, in full context, and how is it even remotely comparable to whatever you said, in full context.
You won't be able to do it, because, you're a retard. So, thanks for playing. Have a • Edited by a Moderator • life.
Last edited by Cow Poke; 01-13-2021, 03:02 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ronson View Post
According to MSM? Gee, it's not like they're biased or anything.
Says me.
All I was hoping for was a new election in contested states.
Can you rephrase that?
Thoroughly loaded question. Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
Eg if someone says:
"I used to beat my wife"
Then:
"when did you stop beating your wife"
Is NOT a loaded question.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gondwanaland View Post
I'm afraid you don't actually get to set such rules. Licona got spanked on that a while back.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oxmixmudd View PostMore often than not that was an accurate description of the response to the 'evidence. In some cases it was more angry, like 'how dare you waste the courts time on this ridiculousness. At least once giulliani admitted he didn't even have evidence of fraud to submit!
Says who?
And why would anyone even consider overturning an election on hearsay without any actual evidence? Hearsay in some cases coming from people that clearly don't have it all together- as we see above.
And so you support Donald Trump's campaign over supposed election fraud that incited a mob to storm the capitol because ...?
If YOU understand Donald Trump's campaign that has completely undermined the peaceful transfer of power is itself fraudulent - i.e YOU know there is not evidence of sufficient fraud to change the result - how in the world do you justify supporting him as he has lied about that fact for nearly three months and as he has undermined the trust of the American people wrt one of the most critical elements of our democracy - to the point many are willing to threaten armed protests of the inauguration in 50 capitols and DC?
Leave a comment:
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by rogue06, Today, 09:33 AM
|
8 responses
45 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 01:56 PM
|
||
Started by whag, Yesterday, 10:43 PM
|
44 responses
195 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 02:44 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:38 AM
|
0 responses
27 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 09:38 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 06:47 AM
|
83 responses
346 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Today, 01:46 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 04-14-2024, 02:07 PM
|
54 responses
339 views
2 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Today, 02:30 PM
|
Leave a comment: