Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Wilbur Ross Remained on Chinese Joint Venture Board While Running US-China Trade War

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LiconaFan97
    replied
    Originally posted by CivilDiscourse View Post

    Where is the chain of custody for these documents. How can you be sure they haven't been doctored?

    We know that china has an interest in interfering with us elections. We know that China has a hand in controlling the actions of many chinese companies. How do you know that this isn't from China's government trying to influence the election?
    I don't. Guess we agree that we should doubt things coming from sources with a vested interest absent sufficient evidence, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • CivilDiscourse
    replied
    @Linconafan97

    Are you continuing this conversation?

    Leave a comment:


  • CivilDiscourse
    replied
    The OP seems to have forgotten this thread

    Leave a comment:


  • Starlight
    replied
    Trump's cabinet: 100% Swamp.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mountain Man
    replied
    Ross says he resigned. These Chinese documents list him as a board member. Frankly, I'm inclined to trust Ross unless there is better evidence showing that he lied.

    Leave a comment:


  • CivilDiscourse
    replied
    Originally posted by LiconaFan97 View Post
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/29...a-board-trade/


    Chinese documents show that the U.S. commerce secretary did not successfully step down from all his corporate commitments.

    Wilbur Ross, an investor-turned-U.S. commerce secretary, has long been accused of ethical violations because of his failure to extricate himself from his business ties. Documents obtained by Foreign Policy show that Ross’s potential conflicts of interest around Chinese business are greater than previously known.

    In Chinese corporate documents obtained by Foreign Policy, Ross is listed as serving on the board of a Chinese joint venture until January 2019—nearly two years into his term as commerce secretary. That joint venture, now called Huaneng Invesco WLR (Beijing) Investment Fund Management Co., is an investment partnership formed in September 2008 between Huaneng Capital Services, the U.S. management company Invesco, and a firm Ross founded, WL Ross & Co. Huaneng Capital Services is an arm of China Huaneng Group, a major state-owned power producer.

    The letter that Ross provided to Foreign Policy is dated Feb. 27, 2017, marked “Confidential,” and has as its subject line “Re: Resignation from WLR Entities.” In the letter, addressed to WL Ross & Co., Ross writes that he “shall be deemed to have retired, resigned or withdrawn” from every entity affiliated with WL Ross & Co. Ross lists dozens of companies that he claims the letter applies to, including those affiliated with Huaneng. But Chinese corporate law experts consulted by Foreign Policy say that under Chinese law, writing a private letter to a U.S. parent company does not remove one from Chinese corporate boards.

    (Invesco, which owns WL Ross & Co., declined to comment for this story.) “The failure to withdraw from the board may have just been an inadvertent slip, but what you said is clearly not a ‘false narrative,’” said Fred Rocafort, an attorney at the international law firm Harris Bricken. “Chinese corporate records establish, without a doubt, that he was officially on the board until February 1, 2019.”


    Doubtless we agree that such a conflict of interest is a serious problem. This is even worse than what is alleged in Huntergate as Ross stood to directly benefit from this conflict and his influence on the trade war would have been significant and easily hidden.

    Article is paywalled but I just stopped the page loading after the story appeared and the blocking element didn't show up.
    Where is the chain of custody for these documents. How can you be sure they haven't been doctored?

    We know that china has an interest in interfering with us elections. We know that China has a hand in controlling the actions of many chinese companies. How do you know that this isn't from China's government trying to influence the election?
    Last edited by CivilDiscourse; 10-30-2020, 07:30 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wilbur Ross Remained on Chinese Joint Venture Board While Running US-China Trade War

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/29...a-board-trade/


    Chinese documents show that the U.S. commerce secretary did not successfully step down from all his corporate commitments.

    Wilbur Ross, an investor-turned-U.S. commerce secretary, has long been accused of ethical violations because of his failure to extricate himself from his business ties. Documents obtained by Foreign Policy show that Ross’s potential conflicts of interest around Chinese business are greater than previously known.

    In Chinese corporate documents obtained by Foreign Policy, Ross is listed as serving on the board of a Chinese joint venture until January 2019—nearly two years into his term as commerce secretary. That joint venture, now called Huaneng Invesco WLR (Beijing) Investment Fund Management Co., is an investment partnership formed in September 2008 between Huaneng Capital Services, the U.S. management company Invesco, and a firm Ross founded, WL Ross & Co. Huaneng Capital Services is an arm of China Huaneng Group, a major state-owned power producer.

    The letter that Ross provided to Foreign Policy is dated Feb. 27, 2017, marked “Confidential,” and has as its subject line “Re: Resignation from WLR Entities.” In the letter, addressed to WL Ross & Co., Ross writes that he “shall be deemed to have retired, resigned or withdrawn” from every entity affiliated with WL Ross & Co. Ross lists dozens of companies that he claims the letter applies to, including those affiliated with Huaneng. But Chinese corporate law experts consulted by Foreign Policy say that under Chinese law, writing a private letter to a U.S. parent company does not remove one from Chinese corporate boards.

    (Invesco, which owns WL Ross & Co., declined to comment for this story.) “The failure to withdraw from the board may have just been an inadvertent slip, but what you said is clearly not a ‘false narrative,’” said Fred Rocafort, an attorney at the international law firm Harris Bricken. “Chinese corporate records establish, without a doubt, that he was officially on the board until February 1, 2019.”


    Doubtless we agree that such a conflict of interest is a serious problem. This is even worse than what is alleged in Huntergate as Ross stood to directly benefit from this conflict and his influence on the trade war would have been significant and easily hidden.

    Article is paywalled but I just stopped the page loading after the story appeared and the blocking element didn't show up.

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by Mountain Man, Yesterday, 10:00 AM
20 responses
133 views
0 likes
Last Post Mountain Man  
Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 06:45 AM
72 responses
391 views
2 likes
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
 
Started by Cow Poke, 01-21-2021, 03:35 PM
40 responses
268 views
0 likes
Last Post whag
by whag
 
Started by Ronson, 01-21-2021, 09:45 AM
34 responses
185 views
0 likes
Last Post Ronson
by Ronson
 
Started by Sparko, 01-21-2021, 09:10 AM
4 responses
44 views
1 like
Last Post Mountain Man  
Working...
X