And in my state no less
The fact is, the Bushmaster AR-15 was perfectly legal under state law and federal law at the time. This argument makes no sense - can we then sue car makers if someone deliberately runs over a bunch of people?
A Connecticut judge on Thursday rejected a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against the maker of a gun used in a 2012 elementary-school shooting that killed 20 children and six adults, the Hartford Courant reports.
Under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), gun-makers are not liable for crimes committed with their products.
However, in a blow to the maker of the Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, Judge Barbara Bellis ruled that law wasn't enough to have the case thrown out at this early stage, according to the Courant.http://finance.yahoo.com/news/judge-...NfMQRzZWMDc2M-
Under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), gun-makers are not liable for crimes committed with their products.
However, in a blow to the maker of the Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, Judge Barbara Bellis ruled that law wasn't enough to have the case thrown out at this early stage, according to the Courant.http://finance.yahoo.com/news/judge-...NfMQRzZWMDc2M-
Comment