The Discovery Institute have released an article about a play, in which a fictional character is "working on a paper whose equations cast doubt on aspects of human evolution". It is just me who thinks that citing fictional characters in a play looks kind of desparate?
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/05...s_e095981.html
Who knows what the future holds for ID? Perhaps a play in which a character gets to actually publish ID research in a peer-reviewed journal?
Meanwhile real science marches on.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/05...s_e095981.html
The play doesn't directly mention intelligent design.... But Stoppard's protagonist Hilary says at one point that she's working on a paper whose equations cast doubt on aspects of human evolution and specifically whether the conventional account allows sufficient time for it. By the end, she has announced that she is making plans to continue her research and studies at New York University...
Meanwhile real science marches on.
Comment