Remarkable Fossils Push Back Snake Origins by 65 Million Years

[rogue06]

Maybe the article should have said "additional information" instead of "rewrite"
"Rewrite" implies 'wrong'

science-news-cycle.jpg

[shunyadragon]

Maybe the article should have said "additional information" instead of "rewrite"
"Rewrite" implies 'wrong'

Maybe, but we are splitting frog hairs on 'wording of articles,' concerning the implications of new discoveries and research that advances the knowledge of science.

[jordanriver]

It depends on what you mean by wrong?!?!?!

All knowledge of science changes and evolves over time with added new discoveries and research.

Do you consider this change and new knowledge wrong?!?!?!?!

Just added more (missing?) links between related species that's all.

Maybe the article should have said "additional information" instead of "rewrite"
"Rewrite" implies 'wrong'

[shunyadragon]

"rewrite" the history of snake evolution..."

...you mean they were ...wrong?

It depends on what you mean by wrong?!?!?!

All knowledge of science changes and evolves over time with added new discoveries and research.

Do you consider this change and new knowledge wrong?!?!?!?!

Just added more (missing?) links between related species that's all.

[jordanriver]

"rewrite" the history of snake evolution..."

...you mean they were ...wrong?

[shunyadragon]

Source: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/remarkable-fossils-push-back-snake-origins-by-65-million-years/?WT.mc_id=SA_EVO_20150202

Remarkable Fossils Push Back Snake Origins by 65 Million Years

© Copyright Original Source