Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Problems with scientific research - particulary medicine

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Problems with scientific research - particulary medicine

    The problems with scientific research related to drugs and other technology fields are cropping up more often with retractions on the rise and lack of follow up due to poor research standards. Part of the problem is likely due to high level of private funding in these areas where quality and follow up are not priorities. The focus is profit and getting the goods to the market


    Science Research Needs an Overhaul

    Earlier this year a series of papers in The Lancet reported that 85 percent of the $265 billion spent each year on medical research is wasted. This is not because of fraud, although it is true that retractions are on the rise. Instead, it is because too often absolutely nothing happens after initial results of a study are published. No follow-up investigations ensue to replicate or expand on a discovery. No one uses the findings to build new technologies.

    The problem is not just what happens after publication—scientists often have trouble choosing the right questions and properly designing studies to answer them. Too many neuroscience studies test too few subjects to arrive at firm conclusions. Researchers publish reports on hundreds of treatments for diseases that work in animal models but not in humans. Drug companies find themselves unable to reproduce promising drug targets published by the best academic institutions. The growing recognition that something has gone awry in the laboratory has led to calls for, as one might guess, more research on research (aka, meta-research)—attempts to find protocols that ensure that peer-reviewed studies are, in fact, valid.

    © Copyright Original Source

    Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
    Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
    But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:

    go with the flow the river knows . . .


    I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.

Related Threads


Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by rogue06, 10-12-2021, 10:31 AM
3 responses
Last Post shunyadragon  
Started by rogue06, 10-12-2021, 07:46 AM
0 responses
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
Started by TheLurch, 10-01-2021, 10:26 AM
56 responses
1 like
Last Post lee_merrill  
Started by oxmixmudd, 10-01-2021, 09:43 AM
37 responses
Last Post rogue06
by rogue06
Started by rogue06, 09-28-2021, 08:23 AM
1 response
1 like
Last Post shunyadragon