Originally posted by Sparko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Food for thought
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by square_peg View Post. . . continues to be the most plausible and supported explanation for the diversity and origins of life on Earth.Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostAs I have pointed out before it is the most plausible explanation if you assume God did not do it.Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.--Isaiah 1:17
I don't think that all forms o[f] slavery are inherently immoral.--seer
Comment
-
Originally posted by rwattsIt would be great if you could tell us what some of those lies are then demonstrate that they are in fact lies.
Perhaps you would like to go back and read those.
And here is an article about the wondrous feathered lizard that was touted as the "missing link" until it was proven a fake, way back in 1999.
http://www.trueorigin.org/ng_ap01.asp
Proven a fake, yes. Still displayed as a model at The Dinosaur Museum in Blanding, Utah, still touted as "one of the earliest known birds to evolve from the dinosaurs."
The person who reported the forgery in the issue of Nat. Geo. stated
The report stated:
It’s a tale of misguided secrecy and misplaced confidence, of rampant egos clashing, self-aggrandizement, wishful thinking, naive assumptions, human error, stubbornness, manipulation, backbiting, lying, corruption, and, most of all, abysmal communication.
There is one blatant lie. Another is Piltdown man. And so many of these lies are STILL in textbooks being taught to our kids today!
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by s_pI thought you said you weren't looking for debate.
Just in case you didn't read the whole thing........
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostI am trying to point out the FACT that many so-called evolutionary scientists seem to have no problem with making statements along the lines of "evolution is a religion", ...
RoyJorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.
MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.
seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by lao tzu View PostThe majority of evolutionists in the U.S. are Christian.
A few created animals could start speciating (epigenetic adjustable for various environments) right after the Bible God Jesus created them.To say that crony capitalism is not true/free market capitalism, is like saying a grand slam is not true baseball, or like saying scoring a touchdown is not true American football ...Stefan Mykhaylo D
Comment
-
Originally posted by square_peg View PostWell, mossrose doesn't think there's any contradiction between believing Christianity is a religion and believing Christianity is true, so it shouldn't matter to her if the theory of evolution could actually be classified as a religion. Because in this case, it'd be an instance of a religion being true.
...but ABOUT religion (because of religion)
IOW, 'reactionary'To say that crony capitalism is not true/free market capitalism, is like saying a grand slam is not true baseball, or like saying scoring a touchdown is not true American football ...Stefan Mykhaylo D
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roy View PostSo what? Do you think saying something makes it true?
Roy
If a scientist tells one lie, then I am under no obligation to believe another word that comes out of his or her mouth.
So, If they lie about evolution being a religion, or they say they have to make stuff up in order to "prove" their theory, and that is also a lie, then I guess I can presume that they are lying every time they open their mouths.
Where in the world does their "truth" kick in, then?
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostUm, I have listed in the op some quotes from those who have clearly stated that they have CONSTRUCTED and CREATED stuff in order to produce results.
Perhaps you would like to go back and read those.
And here is an article about the wondrous feathered lizard that was touted as the "missing link" until it was proven a fake, way back in 1999.
http://www.trueorigin.org/ng_ap01.asp
Proven a fake, yes. Still displayed as a model at The Dinosaur Museum in Blanding, Utah, still touted as "one of the earliest known birds to evolve from the dinosaurs."
The person who reported the forgery in the issue of Nat. Geo. stated
The report stated:
At least the Nat. Geo. had the grace to admit their error in reporting before it was "proven".
There is one blatant lie. Another is Piltdown man. And so many of these lies are STILL in textbooks being taught to our kids today!
Originally posted by mossrose“True? The theory of evolution?
Full of lies, it is!
Do you think that the theory, evidence for it, and testing of it, do not exist beyond fakes and bad museum displays?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mossrose View PostI guess you have a point there.
If a scientist tells one lie, then I am under no obligation to believe another word that comes out of his or her mouth.
So, If they lie about evolution being a religion, or they say they have to make stuff up in order to "prove" their theory, and that is also a lie, then I guess I can presume that they are lying every time they open their mouths.
Where in the world does their "truth" kick in, then?
RoyJorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.
MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.
seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roy View PostWhen you realise that it is possible for two people to express differing opinions or beliefs without either of them telling lies.
Roy
But you can't have more than one truth.
Securely anchored to the Rock amid every storm of trial, testing or tribulation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kbertsche View PostI think Mossy brings up a good point. The word "evolution" has different meanings and implications to different people. To a scientist, "evolution" refers simply to physical mechanisms. But to a non-scientist, "evolution" often means "evolutionISM", an atheistic, materialistic worldview. Outspoken atheists like Richard Dawkins don't help when they conflate the two (evolution and evolutionism) in their popular writings.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-18-2024, 12:15 PM
|
48 responses
135 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
03-20-2024, 09:13 AM
|
||
Started by Sparko, 03-07-2024, 08:52 AM
|
16 responses
74 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-08-2024, 03:12 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 02-28-2024, 11:06 AM
|
6 responses
46 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-08-2024, 03:25 PM
|
Comment