Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Will You Go on Record

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cerebrum123
    replied
    Originally posted by jordanriver View Post
    By the way, shunyadragon,
    ...which logical fallacy am I guilty of
    Genetic Fallacy.

    Leave a comment:


  • jordanriver
    replied
    Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Classic fallacy, please explain.
    By the way, shunyadragon,
    ...which logical fallacy am I guilty of

    Leave a comment:


  • klaus54
    replied
    Originally posted by jordanriver View Post
    Context
    read context of a dialogue
    Shuny was correct that you made a fallacious defense.

    If you understood the message you would have admitted you were wrong.

    Instead you dismissed anything I wrote because the felt the messenger is a jerk.


    BTW, regardless of how jerky I am, you ARE wrong about the age of Earth and Cosmos and the theory of evolution.

    Pure and simple.

    Now about them cyclothems...

    K54

    Leave a comment:


  • jordanriver
    replied
    Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
    Classic fallacy, please explain.
    Context
    read context of a dialogue

    Leave a comment:


  • lilpixieofterror
    replied
    Originally posted by Jorge View Post
    Nahhhh ... not at all. But that is the fantasy that you've drilled into your skull to allow you to sleep better at night.
    I sleep just fine at night because your a laughing stock around here. Why is it that even many of your fellow YEC's give you a wide berth and try not to be associated with you? Could it be because you're a laughing stock among the community to such a degree that atheist and Christian alike hold the same low opinion of you? In order for your words to be taken seriously, you got to be somebody to take serious.

    Well, I won't pop your bubble - continue believing in sweet Tinkerbell and in the "meanie Jorge".
    I never claimed to be totally sweet, so more shoving words down people throat? Again, you're a laughing stock around here. Why should anybody take anything you say seriously?

    Leave a comment:


  • shunyadragon
    replied
    Originally posted by jordanriver View Post
    I don't have a problem with the message.

    Its the messenger
    Classic fallacy, please explain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jorge
    replied
    Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
    More staring into that mirror and just talking to your own projection eh?
    Nahhhh ... not at all. But that is the fantasy that you've drilled into
    your skull to allow you to sleep better at night. Well, I won't pop your
    bubble - continue believing in sweet Tinkerbell and in the "meanie Jorge".

    Jorge

    Leave a comment:


  • lilpixieofterror
    replied
    Originally posted by Jorge View Post
    You wouldn't recognize "substance" if it jumped into your arms and called you "mommy".

    Now, shoo ... shoo !!!
    More staring into that mirror and just talking to your own projection eh?

    Leave a comment:


  • klaus54
    replied
    Originally posted by Jorge View Post
    You wouldn't recognize "substance" if it jumped into your arms and called you "mommy".

    Now, shoo ... shoo !!!

    Jorge
    Did you Google "Appalachian Cyclothems" yet?

    They are definitely in the category of "substance".

    How do they fit in with your ideology?

    Were I to start a thread on cyclothems and transgression-regression sequences, would you be willing to participate?

    K54

    P.S. OK, if you're too lazy to look it up, here's a linky-poo:

    http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/c...2/152.abstract

    Leave a comment:


  • Jorge
    replied
    Originally posted by lilpixieofterror View Post
    Nothing of substance. Just a giant ad hominem. Par the course for you, isn't it?
    You wouldn't recognize "substance" if it jumped into your arms and called you "mommy".

    Now, shoo ... shoo !!!

    Jorge

    Leave a comment:


  • klaus54
    replied
    Originally posted by jordanriver View Post
    I don't have a problem with the message.

    Its the messenger
    Whatever THAT means.

    98% of Christendom will worship tomorrow morning blithely unaware of JR-JORGE BIBLE-GOD YECism.

    And you should too.

    Now about those Appalachian Cyclothems....

    Nah, forget it. You wouldn't understand anyway.

    K54

    Leave a comment:


  • jordanriver
    replied
    Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
    Well, Dear -- sometimes the Truth stings.

    And I'm interested in Truth.

    I believe nature IS Creation, and logic a la scientific method is the way it is known beyond the aesthetic and faerie tale.

    You apparently don't.

    If the pursuit of richness of Truth evidenced in the stars and strata and silica makes me a jerk in your eyes, so be it.

    But...

    K54~
    I don't have a problem with the message.

    Its the messenger

    Leave a comment:


  • klaus54
    replied
    Originally posted by jordanriver View Post
    ...you know, God loves you . . . .

    . . . . .but I'm beginning to think you're a jerk . . . .
    Well, Dear -- sometimes the Truth stings.

    And I'm interested in Truth.

    I believe nature IS Creation, and logic a la scientific method is the way it is known beyond the aesthetic and faerie tale.

    You apparently don't.

    If the pursuit of richness of Truth evidenced in the stars and strata and silica makes me a jerk in your eyes, so be it.

    But...

    I thank God I've graduated beyond the Sundae Skool level of the Fisher-Price My-First-Picture-Bible(tm) version of Genesis.

    But you -- you enjoy the Spanish Rice in the insular surrounding of the Baptist church picnic.

    The Kool-Aid flows like water there.

    K54

    P.S. ~cough~ Appalachian cyclothems ~cough~

    ~cough~ History in the Rocks ~cough~

    Leave a comment:


  • jordanriver
    replied
    Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
    Well, I have a pretty good idea.

    I also have a pretty good idea that Earth is a sphere which rotates one a day and revolves around the Sun once a year. . . . . . . . .


    K54
    ...you know, God loves you . . . .

    . . . . .but I'm beginning to think you're a jerk . . . .

    Leave a comment:


  • jordanriver
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy View Post
    I know what I wrote. I also know it differed from what you 'quoted'. And now so do you.

    Roy
    Yes, from memory I missed "on the" and put "with"

    I guess that changed everything

    Leave a comment:

Related Threads

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-18-2024, 12:15 PM
48 responses
135 views
0 likes
Last Post Sparko
by Sparko
 
Started by Sparko, 03-07-2024, 08:52 AM
16 responses
74 views
0 likes
Last Post shunyadragon  
Started by rogue06, 02-28-2024, 11:06 AM
6 responses
46 views
0 likes
Last Post shunyadragon  
Working...
X