Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Great New AronRa video, Evolution is a fact

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Jorge View Post
    "Jorge: the DIRECT implications of the fundamental Evolutionary Principle of "survival of the fittest" may be, has been and will continue to be used as "scientific" justification for ... homosexual practices"

    Before I am forced to go to the Mods, I am asking that you remove the above instance of dishonest misrepresentation achieved by taking something out of its full context. It appears that the ONLY way that you people can attain some measure of "victory" is through dishonest practices.

    Now, if you use the ENTIRE post in which the above was contained then you may do so.

    You have your ONE warning.

    Jorge
    Could you kindly explain in what context your anti-evolution diatribe DID address homosexuality?

    Thank you.

    K54

    Comment


    • Originally posted by seer View Post
      Or a very valid description would be that we just got lucky. Certain random mutation, just happened to be beneficial, because of the environment we happened to find ourselves in. And I'm not sure what you mean by predictable outcome. You mean you can predict how a species will develop over the next million years or that it will even survive? What are you predicting?
      Method,

      Do you see the kind of nonsense we're dealing with here?

      "seer"

      1) doesn't understand probability distributions. He thinks if P(event A) != 1, then event A is a "chance" event.

      2) then he takes a further leap of idiocy by demanding that probabilistic events should lead to 100% determinism, even millions of years from now.

      It's not worth the effort to argue with him, but pointing out his ignorance might be edifying to some lurkers.

      K54

      Comment

      Related Threads

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-18-2024, 12:15 PM
      48 responses
      135 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Sparko
      by Sparko
       
      Started by Sparko, 03-07-2024, 08:52 AM
      16 responses
      74 views
      0 likes
      Last Post shunyadragon  
      Started by rogue06, 02-28-2024, 11:06 AM
      6 responses
      48 views
      0 likes
      Last Post shunyadragon  
      Working...
      X