It sounds almost like the distinction is between observation and inference. After all, observations are always inferences based on a model of some lower level of abstraction. We watch apples fall, and we infer gravity. We measure gravity directly, and we infer gravitons or some other underlying cause. If it were not for inferences, science could not make predictions, since predictions are derived from a model constructed of inferences from prior observations. Experiments are not only means by which less ambiguous observations can be made, they are tests of hypotheses arising from a model. Confirmation by others helps verify (but not necessarily validate) the model. Model construction and test is common to all types of scientific observation.
Of course, we all know the problem here is that a means must be found to invalidate models (regardless of how well supported) which are theologically uncongenial. But why try to fabricate an operational/historical distinction when it's much easier (and far more honest) to divide models into godly and ungodly categories? A scientific litmus test is problematic because all observations recede into the past from the moment they are made, and all inferences are based on past observations. A theological litmus test is much easier, since one need only decide whether one's theology can tolerate a given inference. In much the same way that Stalin listened to each Shostakovich symphony before the first public performance to decide whether the music was politically correct.
Of course, we all know the problem here is that a means must be found to invalidate models (regardless of how well supported) which are theologically uncongenial. But why try to fabricate an operational/historical distinction when it's much easier (and far more honest) to divide models into godly and ungodly categories? A scientific litmus test is problematic because all observations recede into the past from the moment they are made, and all inferences are based on past observations. A theological litmus test is much easier, since one need only decide whether one's theology can tolerate a given inference. In much the same way that Stalin listened to each Shostakovich symphony before the first public performance to decide whether the music was politically correct.
Comment