Originally posted by Duragizer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Natural Science 301 Guidelines
This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
John Sanford's Biblical evidence for genetic meltdown
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Omniskeptical View PostEven weirder still, the messengers/sons of God are also virgin males who don't reproduce. They have virginity for some reason, which human males don't have.
"6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose."
Is the problem here that the sons of God were taking all the hot chicks, and leaving none for the guys?
Why did they marry them? It would seem more demonic to have sex outside of marriage. You seem to be saying they did quite the reverse; they got married, but never had sex.
When you say human males do not have virginity, do you mean in the physical sense in which females do, i.e,m the hymen?My Blog: http://oncreationism.blogspot.co.uk/
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Pixie View PostSo what is this all about?
"6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose."
Is the problem here that the sons of God were taking all the hot chicks, and leaving none for the guys?
Why did they marry them? It would seem more demonic to have sex outside of marriage. You seem to be saying they did quite the reverse; they got married, but never had sex.
When you say human males do not have virginity, do you mean in the physical sense in which females do, i.e,m the hymen?
Comment
-
They took them as women not wives despite the translation.
The Giants came from these conceptions.
Just who are these "sons of God"? The term applies to angels, demons, and even to humans, depending on circumstance.1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
.⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Scripture before Tradition:
but that won't prevent others from
taking it upon themselves to deprive you
of the right to call yourself Christian.
⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
Comment
-
Originally posted by Omniskeptical View PostIt is both scriptural and scientific.
Perhaps, you don't know what you are talking about."When the Western world accepted Christianity, Caesar conquered; and the received text of Western theology was edited by his lawyers…. The brief Galilean vision of humility flickered throughout the ages, uncertainly…. But the deeper idolatry, of the fashioning of God in the image of the Egyptian, Persian, and Roman imperial rulers, was retained. The Church gave unto God the attributes which belonged exclusively to Caesar."
— Alfred North Whitehead
Comment
-
Jorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.
MM: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
MM on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.
seer: I believe that so called 'compassion' [for starving Palestinian kids] maybe a cover for anti Semitism, ...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Omniskeptical View PostAs a male, I never could have been.
K54
P.S. Oh, I get it now. The opposite is true. I was never a "virgin" -- whatever that means in your bleu cheese moonbat version of reality.
Comment
-
Originally posted by klaus54 View PostWow! Then my experience in a lovely shaded hemlock glade with a GORGEOUS strawberry blonde in April 1973 must just be a VERY vivid dream.
K54Last edited by Omniskeptical; 08-02-2014, 02:21 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Omniskeptical View PostIt didn't certainly change thy non-existant virginity. Being male, [thou art] obviously aren't one no matter how "sexually derprived" thou supposedly may beith. Thou couldn't gain it by being born, and thou wilt get it by being dead.
Am I or am I not a virgin still?
Was I or was I not a virgin when sperm met egg in early 1954?
Deep theology like this is above my pay grade.
K54
Comment
-
Originally posted by klaus54 View PostI'm confused. So was I or was I not a virgin before my rendezvous with, let's call her "Diane"?
Am I or am I not a virgin still?
Was I or was I not a virgin when sperm met egg in early 1954?
Deep theology like this is above my pay grade.
K54
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-18-2024, 12:15 PM
|
48 responses
136 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
03-20-2024, 09:13 AM
|
||
Started by Sparko, 03-07-2024, 08:52 AM
|
16 responses
74 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-08-2024, 03:12 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 02-28-2024, 11:06 AM
|
6 responses
48 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by shunyadragon
03-08-2024, 03:25 PM
|
Comment