Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

John Sanford's Biblical evidence for genetic meltdown

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Duragizer View Post
    So I came out of the womb already having done the deed? Hot dog!
    It is both scriptural and scientific. Perhaps, you don't know what you are talking about.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
      Even weirder still, the messengers/sons of God are also virgin males who don't reproduce. They have virginity for some reason, which human males don't have.
      So what is this all about?

      "6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose."

      Is the problem here that the sons of God were taking all the hot chicks, and leaving none for the guys?

      Why did they marry them? It would seem more demonic to have sex outside of marriage. You seem to be saying they did quite the reverse; they got married, but never had sex.

      When you say human males do not have virginity, do you mean in the physical sense in which females do, i.e,m the hymen?
      My Blog: http://oncreationism.blogspot.co.uk/

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by The Pixie View Post
        So what is this all about?

        "6 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose."

        Is the problem here that the sons of God were taking all the hot chicks, and leaving none for the guys?

        Why did they marry them? It would seem more demonic to have sex outside of marriage. You seem to be saying they did quite the reverse; they got married, but never had sex.

        When you say human males do not have virginity, do you mean in the physical sense in which females do, i.e,m the hymen?
        They took them as women not wives despite the translation. The Giants came from these conceptions. Male humans don't have a cork, thus they aren't virgins. Thanx to the catholic church, the word virgin means nothing.

        Comment


        • #34
          They took them as women not wives despite the translation.
          They took the women (nashim) for themselves.
          The Giants came from these conceptions.
          Were they giants physically? Nephilim doesn't necessarily (or even primarily) describe physique.

          Just who are these "sons of God"? The term applies to angels, demons, and even to humans, depending on circumstance.
          sigpic1 Cor 15:34 εκνηψατε δικαιως και μη αμαρτανετε αγνωσιαν γαρ θεου τινες εχουσιν προς εντροπην υμιν λεγω

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
            It is both scriptural and scientific.
            I wonder who I lost my pre-birth virginity to.

            Perhaps, you don't know what you are talking about.
            That's possible. Of course, it's also possible you're just projecting -- TO THE EXTREME!
            "When the Western world accepted Christianity, Caesar conquered; and the received text of Western theology was edited by his lawyers…. The brief Galilean vision of humility flickered throughout the ages, uncertainly…. But the deeper idolatry, of the fashioning of God in the image of the Egyptian, Persian, and Roman imperial rulers, was retained. The Church gave unto God the attributes which belonged exclusively to Caesar."

            — Alfred North Whitehead

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Duragizer View Post
              That's possible. Of course, it's also possible you're just projecting -- TO THE EXTREME!
              Virginity is not a sexual activity, thus you are the one projecting.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
                Virginity is not a sexual activity, thus you are the one projecting.
                So are you a virgin or not?

                K54

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                  So are you a virgin or not?
                  I reckon he's a Cancer.

                  Roy
                  Jorge: Functional Complex Information is INFORMATION that is complex and functional.

                  mikewhitney: What if the speed of light changed when light is passing through water? ... I have 3 semesters of college Physics.

                  Mountain Man: First of all, the Bible is a fixed document.
                  Mountain Man on covid-19: We're talking about an illness with a better than 99.9% rate of survival.

                  Sparko: Even the deists like Jefferson believed in the Christian God, ...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                    So are you a virgin or not?

                    K54
                    As a male, I never could have been.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
                      As a male, I never could have been.
                      Wow! Then my experience in a lovely shaded hemlock glade with a GORGEOUS strawberry blonde in April 1973 must just be a VERY vivid dream.

                      K54

                      P.S. Oh, I get it now. The opposite is true. I was never a "virgin" -- whatever that means in your bleu cheese moonbat version of reality.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                        Wow! Then my experience in a lovely shaded hemlock glade with a GORGEOUS strawberry blonde in April 1973 must just be a VERY vivid dream.

                        K54
                        It didn't certainly change thy non-existant virginity. Being male, [thou art] obviously aren't one no matter how "sexually derprived" thou supposedly may beith. Thou couldn't gain it by being born, and thou wilt get it by being dead.
                        Last edited by Omniskeptical; 08-02-2014, 02:21 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Omniskeptical View Post
                          It didn't certainly change thy non-existant virginity. Being male, [thou art] obviously aren't one no matter how "sexually derprived" thou supposedly may beith. Thou couldn't gain it by being born, and thou wilt get it by being dead.
                          I'm confused. So was I or was I not a virgin before my rendezvous with, let's call her "Diane"?

                          Am I or am I not a virgin still?

                          Was I or was I not a virgin when sperm met egg in early 1954?

                          Deep theology like this is above my pay grade.

                          K54

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by klaus54 View Post
                            I'm confused. So was I or was I not a virgin before my rendezvous with, let's call her "Diane"?

                            Am I or am I not a virgin still?

                            Was I or was I not a virgin when sperm met egg in early 1954?

                            Deep theology like this is above my pay grade.

                            K54
                            According to the Latin definition, you never were one.

                            Comment

                            Related Threads

                            Collapse

                            Topics Statistics Last Post
                            Started by rogue06, 10-12-2021, 10:31 AM
                            3 responses
                            31 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post shunyadragon  
                            Started by rogue06, 10-12-2021, 07:46 AM
                            0 responses
                            11 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post rogue06
                            by rogue06
                             
                            Started by TheLurch, 10-01-2021, 10:26 AM
                            56 responses
                            302 views
                            1 like
                            Last Post lee_merrill  
                            Started by oxmixmudd, 10-01-2021, 09:43 AM
                            37 responses
                            199 views
                            0 likes
                            Last Post rogue06
                            by rogue06
                             
                            Started by rogue06, 09-28-2021, 08:23 AM
                            1 response
                            21 views
                            1 like
                            Last Post shunyadragon  
                            Working...
                            X