Originally posted by phank
View Post
The YEC/Deep Time and Deep History is so anachronistic, sort of like debating the value of bloodletting to treat inflammatory quinsy.
It IS interesting to see if the YEC can come up with SOMETHING.
Since their theological view of creation is based on an inerrant, infallible reading of the Genesis stories ueber Alles, I would at least like to see one try to give an unambiguous, direct, plain, simple, straightforward, literal reading of the Genesis stories.
But so far no one has come forward. I mean if that Genesis reading trumps all of the science, shouldn't it at least by expounded someplace?
K54
Leave a comment: