Announcement

Collapse

Natural Science 301 Guidelines

This is an open forum area for all members for discussions on all issues of science and origins. This area will and does get volatile at times, but we ask that it be kept to a dull roar, and moderators will intervene to keep the peace if necessary. This means obvious trolling and flaming that becomes a problem will be dealt with, and you might find yourself in the doghouse.

As usual, Tweb rules apply. If you haven't read them now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

The Sense Of Smell: How Did It Happen?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by HMS_Beagle View Post
    No one in science says or thinks evolution happens entirely by chance.
    Really? So there is intention involved?
    Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by seer View Post
      Really? So there is intention involved?
      No. Evolution is an iterative process that involves feedback from natural selection which determines the genetic makeup of each subsequent generation. It has a chance component but the whole process is not strictly chance.

      I know you've had that explained to you a dozen times too.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by HMS_Beagle View Post
        No. Evolution is an iterative process that involves feedback from natural selection which determines the genetic makeup of each subsequent generation. It has a chance component but the whole process is not strictly chance.
        But mutations that create the novelty which natural selection then saves do come about by chance? Correct? And we were speaking of mutations - right?
        Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by HMS_Beagle View Post
          No. Evolution is an iterative process that involves feedback from natural selection which determines the genetic makeup of each subsequent generation. It has a chance component but the whole process is not strictly chance.

          I know you've had that explained to you a dozen times too.
          You regurgitate the Party Linetm quite well, Beagle-Boy ... Polly wanna cracker?

          Okay, enough fun, let's get serious ...

          Does selection -- selecting from something that ALREADY EXISTS -- introduce novelty into an (alleged) Evolutionary
          process? No, of course not - selection does as the name implies - it selects, period! BTW, 'selects' explicitly means
          that from an original set of members, some are 'selected' (they 'move on'), some are not (Evolutionary dead-end).

          Okay, so if selection (Natural Selection) does not bring about the Evolutionary novelty, then what's left?
          Golly-gee-wiz ... the only remaining thing is CHANCE! It cannot be design / teleology because that
          is verboten in the "science" of these payasos. Thus, chance and only chance is the mechanism that
          provides the modifications to earlier generations from which NS may "select" thus giving rise to the
          future generations... chance and only chance provides the changes that Evolution needs.

          Yup, it is chance! Yet these people will deny with every breath - just as Tiggy-Pooh does above -
          that it is chance. Wanna know why they deny, deny and deny? I'll tell you. Because even they
          aren't stupid enough to think that people will buy such nonsense. And so they deny in the hope that
          people aren't paying attention and so their con will succeed (sadly, most people aren't paying attention
          and so end up being bamboozled by these con artists). Just as the above post demonstrates.

          That's why folks like myself are strongly disliked by these people - they hate being shown up.

          Jorge
          Last edited by Jorge; 06-11-2014, 04:23 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by seer View Post
            But mutations that create the novelty which natural selection then saves do come about by chance? Correct? And we were speaking of mutations - right?
            Hehe ... see my previous post which I was writing as you wrote yours.

            Jorge

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Jorge View Post
              That's why folks like myself are strongly disliked by these people - they hate being shown up.

              Jorge
              It couldn't be because or your winning ways?
              Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by seer View Post
                But mutations that create the novelty which natural selection then saves do come about by chance? Correct? And we were speaking of mutations - right?
                We're talking about the evolution of the whole olfactory sensing system. Genetic variations are random WRT reproductive fitness but their overall accumulation isn't strictly random.

                Repeat that over to yourself until it sinks in.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jorge View Post

                  BWAAAAK! BWAAAK! buc buc buc BWAAAAAKK!!

                  Jorge
                  You soiled yourself with chickenpoop again Clucky. Go clean yourself up.
                  Last edited by HMS_Beagle; 06-11-2014, 04:32 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by seer View Post
                    But mutations that create the novelty which natural selection then saves do come about by chance? Correct? And we were speaking of mutations - right?
                    Mutation is not the only mechanism involved.
                    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosit...chanisms.shtml
                    Interesting topic.
                    The sense of smell like many other senses comes from the need of even the simplest creature to be able to find food and avoid toxins.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by seer View Post
                      It couldn't be because or your winning ways?

                      Nah ... no way. They absolutely HATE being showed up.
                      Even if I did it very nicely, they'd be just as upset. I know Biblical Creationists
                      that are the epitome of being gentle and diplomatic. Yet they get trashed
                      by Atheists / Theistic Evolutionists every time that they have the audacity
                      to show that these A / TE are wrong. What they hate is the TRUTH.

                      Jorge

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                        Mutation is not the only mechanism involved.
                        http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosit...chanisms.shtml
                        Interesting topic.
                        The sense of smell like many other senses comes from the need of even the simplest creature to be able to find food and avoid toxins.
                        Uhmmm ... so before they had the sense of smell (or the other senses),
                        did they do without food and run into toxins? But ... but ... that would mean DEATH!
                        IOW, while "Evolution" produced these senses, they would have died.

                        Ya know, I don't think I'll buy your fable today ... tomorrow doesn't look any better.

                        Jorge

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Jorge View Post
                          Nah ... no way. They absolutely HATE being showed up.
                          Even if I did it very nicely, they'd be just as upset. I know Biblical Creationists
                          that are the epitome of being gentle and diplomatic. Yet they get trashed
                          by Atheists / Theistic Evolutionists every time that they have the audacity
                          to show that these A / TE are wrong. What they hate is the TRUTH.

                          Jorge
                          While I have at times seen such exchanges get a bit heated most of them turn out to be cordial and even upon occasion productive. Unlike those with folks who arrogantly make proclamations that they expect to be taken at face value and who are notorious about presenting the same litany of excuses[1] for not actually supporting their claims with corroborating evidence.





                          1. You know, like declaring that the person requesting evidence must be drunk, deluded, dishonest or on drugs so that it would be a waste of time to respond. Stuff like that

                          I'm always still in trouble again

                          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                            Mutation is not the only mechanism involved.
                            http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosit...chanisms.shtml
                            Interesting topic.
                            The sense of smell like many other senses comes from the need of even the simplest creature to be able to find food and avoid toxins.
                            Yep. As the earliest multi-cellular creatures first evolved the capability of locomotion being able to sense your surrounding environment was a huge advantage. Rudimentary sight, rudimentary smell, rudimentary hearing all gave big benefits. If you could move towards a food source or away from a danger you had a much better chance of surviving. It wasn't necessary for these senses to develop to their present degrees of refinement immediately. Just small incremental increases in performance over time did the trick.

                            BTW please excuse Jorge. He's the board's resident idiot who tries to cover his scientific incompetence with lots of bluster and braggadocio.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by HMS_Beagle View Post
                              Yep. As the earliest multi-cellular creatures first evolved the capability of locomotion being able to sense your surrounding environment was a huge advantage. Rudimentary sight, rudimentary smell, rudimentary hearing all gave big benefits. If you could move towards a food source or away from a danger you had a much better chance of surviving. It wasn't necessary for these senses to develop to their present degrees of refinement immediately. Just small incremental increases in performance over time did the trick.

                              BTW please excuse Jorge. He's the board's resident idiot who tries to cover his scientific incompetence with lots of bluster and braggadocio.
                              .............. whew!!! okay, 'nuff of that ...

                              Jorge

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by Jorge View Post

                                BTW please excuse Jorge. He's the board's resident idiot who tries to cover his scientific incompetence with lots of bluster and braggadocio.
                                .............. whew!!! okay, 'nuff of that ...

                                Jorge
                                Q.E.D. and yes, Jorge really is too dense to know he just demonstrated the point.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by eider, 04-14-2024, 03:22 AM
                                59 responses
                                189 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Sparko
                                by Sparko
                                 
                                Started by Ronson, 04-08-2024, 09:05 PM
                                41 responses
                                166 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Working...
                                X