Originally posted by TheLurch
View Post
That's completely orthogonal to junk DNA. The "multiple codes" papers are about areas that encode proteins. Nobody considers those junk.
In any event, it is well beyond the observable facts to dogmatically claim that "junk DNA" is truly "junk" as certain Evolutionists do. They are merely speaking from ignorance.
One thing is indisputable: if most of the genome truly is "junk DNA" then that would support Evolutionism. If there is a miniscule, insignificant or no "junk DNA" in the genome then that would not support Evolutionism. In other words, there is undoubtedly an ideological motivation towards promoting the notion of junk DNA. I'll let you draw your own conclusions from that.
So, again, when your travels allow, i'd like to hear some of the evidence you feel has supported your position.
Jorge
Leave a comment: