This one looks as if it could be a breakthrough in understanding a putative natural origin of life. The New Scientist article is here:-
Spark of life metabolism appears in lab without cells
The research article, and it's more difficult title is here:-
Non‐enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway‐like reactions in a plausible Archean ocean
It is important to note the difference between real science and the creation science as explained to us by Jorge.
In real science, people get and idea and go out and test it, collect evidence for it, write up what they did or what they found, etc. This is not a perfect system by a long shot, given all the human foibles we posses. But these folk to back up their ideas and they publish their claims and how they went about discovering them and collecting evidence in support of them. Naturally these ideas are open to examination and criticism.
In the creation science described by Jorge, at best you get this:-
- or this:-
And so it goes.
Spark of life metabolism appears in lab without cells
The research article, and it's more difficult title is here:-
Non‐enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway‐like reactions in a plausible Archean ocean
It is important to note the difference between real science and the creation science as explained to us by Jorge.
In real science, people get and idea and go out and test it, collect evidence for it, write up what they did or what they found, etc. This is not a perfect system by a long shot, given all the human foibles we posses. But these folk to back up their ideas and they publish their claims and how they went about discovering them and collecting evidence in support of them. Naturally these ideas are open to examination and criticism.
In the creation science described by Jorge, at best you get this:-
Originally posted by Jorge explaining creation science
Originally posted by Jorge explaining creation science
Comment