Would thousands of solar concentrator plants drive up global temperatures? Sparko says yes. I say not necessarily. I started this thread because I think the readers of the thread in which Sparko claimed that all those putative plants would heat up the atmosphere--would appreciate a choice of not following the debate or of following it.
Just concentrating the solar input spatially, onto a small space, does not necessarily change the global temperature overall. What Sparko overlooked is that the total amount of input from the Sun does not change at all, from the unconcentrated state to the putative concentrated state. I concede that it is possible for the global temperature to SLIGHTLY rise, but that would not necessarily be because the input went up. Indeed, the temperature may go down, depending on the details of how the atmosphere-ocean "responds" to the putative different scenario.
Just concentrating the solar input spatially, onto a small space, does not necessarily change the global temperature overall. What Sparko overlooked is that the total amount of input from the Sun does not change at all, from the unconcentrated state to the putative concentrated state. I concede that it is possible for the global temperature to SLIGHTLY rise, but that would not necessarily be because the input went up. Indeed, the temperature may go down, depending on the details of how the atmosphere-ocean "responds" to the putative different scenario.
Comment